Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
Living wills are useless in a lot of cases. That is what people are not being told.

Why Not Sign a Living Will Instead of the Will to Live? From the National Right to Life

Many people who simply do not want what they see as a lot of medical technology prolonging the last few hours or days of their lives when they are terminally ill sign living wills. If you do, in many states you may not know what you're really signing.

Webster's Dictionary defines "terminal" as "of or in the final stages of a fatal disease." And this is what the ordinary person thinks: that somebody who is "terminally ill" is someone who will inevitably die, whose death cannot be prevented by medical treatment.

But in many states, that is not what it means. Instead, for the purposes of the living will you are legally in a "terminal condition" even if your life could be saved--so as to live indefinitely--by medical treatment, so long as you would still have a permanent disability of some kind.

If you sign a legal document you ought to be able to expect that the words in it mean what they are generally understood to mean. If you sign a contract selling your "car" you should not later discover that a legislative act has defined "car" to include "house" and that you're now homeless. But that is exactly what the laws in many states have done with the wording of their living wills.

Another example: Many people who would not want what they consider the extremes of medical technology would be horrified at the idea of being starved to death. But the laws of most states define the medical treatment that is refused by their living wills to include food and water. While a few states at least have a "check-off" so you can choose whether or not to be starved, in the majority you have no indication in the living will you sign that you are agreeing to starvation.

One widely used "Living Will Declaration," states, "If I should be in an incurable or irreversible mental or physical condition with no reasonable expectation of recovery, I direct my attending physician to withhold or withdraw treatment that merely prolongs my dying." This is broad indeed.

If you walk with a limp that can't be corrected, you have an "irreversible ... physical condition." If you have grown forgetful, with some irretrievable memory loss, you may well have an "incurable ... mental condition." If either of these happens to you, and--having signed the "Living Will Declaration"--you become unable to speak for yourself, that means you will be deprived of all medical treatment and food and water (possibly including what you could be spoon fed) except pain medication and treatment to keep you "comfortable." Any irreversible disability qualifies as a basis for death.

The term "merely prolongs my dying" may sound as though it limits this, but it really doesn't. No time frame is given, and the truth is that we are all "dying." Literally every life-saving medical treatment "prolongs dying," in the legal sense.

The bottom line is this: if you are someone who doesn't want medical technology to prolong your last hours, but who also doesn't want to be starved or allowed to die just because you have a disability, your wishes will be far more likely to be respected if you sign a properly prepared Will to Live than if you sign a living will.


Terri Schiavo Before dehydration

God Bless you Terri. May justice one day be served for you

Let everyone who said your beautiful smile was fake be haunted by it for the rest of their days.

97 posted on 07/08/2005 6:33:54 PM PDT by Earthdweller (US descendant of French Protestants_"Where there is life, there is hope"..Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Earthdweller

That was very interesting. Thanks for posting.


99 posted on 07/08/2005 6:36:27 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: Earthdweller; summer
Living wills are useless in a lot of cases. That is what people are not being told.

Yes, I know...I've read it when you've posted it before.

And that's exactly my point...that we should be honoring people's wishes, not just yelling "life at all costs" or asking for executive or parental intervention against a legal spouse.

Again, it's a Culture of DisrespectTM being pushed, where people are being used as pawns, rather than recognizing they are individuals who have individual desires. Let's respect Advance Directives/Living Wills/Spousal Proxy/Proxy Assignment, etc...all the tools to express our own wishes!

103 posted on 07/08/2005 6:43:12 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson