Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/10/2005 8:16:44 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RWR8189

Nominate Zell Miller!


2 posted on 07/10/2005 8:37:17 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
President Bush has never given any indication whatsoever, directly, indirectly or otherwise that he won't do exactly as he has said he will do a thousand times in the last five years.

He has never said anything about appointing Gonzales or any other Hispanic. That is pure speculation by the talking head pundits who have to say things interesting to keep getting face time and copy lines. Judicial appointees aren't exactly an exciting subject to Joe six pack.

If they had started a rumor that he was going to appoint a gay person all of the media would have repeated it and the third-party-pretending -to-be-Republicans on FR would be posting the same crud about Bush being a traitor and how they were never going to contribute to the Republican Party again.

3 posted on 07/10/2005 8:44:08 PM PDT by bayourod (Winning elections is everything in a democracy. Losing is for people unclear on the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Given the way some here treated Gonzales, I'd disagree with Fred that the response in defense was not without warrent. Perhaps it could have earned a qualifier since not everyone or even a majority did so, but certainly a sizeable portion.

At the same time, a senior Bush adviser was urging journalists to read Federalist No. 76, in which Alexander Hamilton advised presidents against naming cronies to high positions.

I note people have refrained from making note of this in the Gonzales controversy.

I trust Bush. He's given me no reason to think him anything but an honest man. That is a rare quality in a politician. Usually because honest man bring the furor of their bases on their head when they admit straight up they won't do everything they want. Then again, you know where you stand with an honest man and this is why he has such trust on issues like the WOT where he has been true to course.

Could always be wrong, but I suspect he'll do right in his nominee.

4 posted on 07/10/2005 8:53:26 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Fred Barnes lays it out straight. President will appoint a conservative, Democrats cannot make a filibuster stick.
5 posted on 07/10/2005 9:23:52 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

"Three of the Republicans have already indicated they'd vote to invoke the "nuclear option" to thwart a judicial filibuster. And only two defectors from the Gang of 14 are needed to pass the nuclear option."

No. Specter will vote to defeat the nuclear option, if his vote is crucial. That means 3 defectors from the Gang of 14 are needed. So far we count 3, which looks good, unless the count is suspect or there is another "sleeper" RINO in the Republican deck.


7 posted on 07/10/2005 10:54:58 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
My nominee which would ignite nuclear fireworks - Ann Coulter.
11 posted on 07/10/2005 11:50:28 PM PDT by etcetera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Pretty simple. Bush said he'd nominate judges like Scalia and Thomas. If he doesn't, he's a liar.


15 posted on 07/11/2005 7:20:52 AM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson