Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/11/2005 5:52:33 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Pikamax
Another lawmaker said the intentional disclosure of a covert agent's identity amounted to an "act of treason."

Treason? I'm surprised they haven't offered him a Congressional Medal of Honor.

2 posted on 07/11/2005 5:54:04 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

rove is not negotiable.


3 posted on 07/11/2005 5:54:51 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

"Aaaaaaaah, Shaddap!"
4 posted on 07/11/2005 5:55:40 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (Hillary '08 -- A 9/10 candidate in a 9/11 world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
The intentional disclosure of a covert CIA agent's identity would be an act of treason," Waxman said.

It's a shame Plame was a deskjocky and not a covert agent.

5 posted on 07/11/2005 5:56:44 PM PDT by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

This last ditch attempt to blame Rove is truly hilarious. When it all comes out that Wilson himself was the leaker, a lot of people on the other side are going to look really stupid(er).


6 posted on 07/11/2005 5:57:07 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
McClellan said: "I spoke with those individuals... and those individuals assured me they were not involved in this... the leaking of classified information."

From what I understand McClellan is correct.. no leaking of CLASSIFIED information happened.

7 posted on 07/11/2005 5:57:28 PM PDT by noexcuses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Leaks, honesty, keeping promises.....can yall believe this? I hope GB tells them to go pound sand.


8 posted on 07/11/2005 5:57:46 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Reid, Lautenburg, Schumer and Waxman.

The four horses' a$$es of the apocalypse.

It will be interesting when the Grand Jury decision comes out.

10 posted on 07/11/2005 6:00:18 PM PDT by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
I agree. President Bush needs to fire Rove - AFTER HE IS CONFIRMED TO THE USSC!

Take THAT snively whiny rats!

11 posted on 07/11/2005 6:00:19 PM PDT by Enterprise (Thus sayeth our rulers - "All your property is mine." - - - Kelo vs New London)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

let's make a deal. Rove will resign when "Leaky Leahy" resigns for leaking intel reports when he was on that committee.


12 posted on 07/11/2005 6:00:57 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"The recent disclosures about Mr. Rove's actions have such serious implications that we can no longer responsibly ignore them. The intentional disclosure of a covert CIA agent's identity would be an act of treason," Waxman said.

Why then when democrats exposed CIA agents and got them killed was it not an act of treason?

The liberal double standard should be obivous to anyone, but the lapdog media whores won't ever tell anyone about the left's attempts to expose and undermine the intelligence gathering capabilities of this country.

13 posted on 07/11/2005 6:01:45 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

If the Rats were not such power-hungry, treasonous slimeballs willing to sell the country down the river for their personal power grab fantasies, this whole thing would be laughable. They would love to get rid of Rove for the same reason they want to get rid of the SecDef -- he's good at what he does.


14 posted on 07/11/2005 6:02:05 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
No, Sandy Berger should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
15 posted on 07/11/2005 6:03:49 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah


16 posted on 07/11/2005 6:06:20 PM PDT by msf92497 (My brain is "twitchy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Another lawmaker said the intentional disclosure of a covert agent's identity amounted to an "act of treason."

I'm sure that they would love that.

Except that he didn't do that. He answered a question about who had authorized the Joe Wilson trip. Rove responded that it wasn't DCIA Tenet or Dick Cheney, as Wilson claimed. He simply said, "Wilson's wife works at CIA and he believed that she may have arranged the trip", which it turns out to be absolutely the case as she, indeed, recommended and pushed for her husband to take the trip.

At no point did Rove mention Valerie Plame's name. Further, there is no intention when you answer a "who arranged a trip?" question, but don't include the name. The only thing that you could say is that Rove INTENTIONALLY DID NOT mention Valerie Plames name.

If a report (Bob Novak) calls the CIA and verifies that a) Joe Wilson's wife does work at CIA, b) that her name is Valerie Plame (which was actually published by Wilson himself in at least 3 places on the Internet...of all places), and that c) he was going to publish the name, to wit CIA didn't request that her name be excluded, a request that Novak himself said he would have honored if CIA would have indicated that she was a "sensitive" source.

And, it really was a set-up from the word go. Read FREEPER Wolfstars post: Set up? Anatomy of the contrived Wilson "scandal".

The demoCREEPS, aided by their friends in the mainstream press, have seized on the now-infamous "16 words" as a way to create friction for Bush, specifically, and Rove, in general.

This really is the mother-of-all-BS-media stories.

17 posted on 07/11/2005 6:06:37 PM PDT by mattdono ("Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags" -Big Arnie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

If Bush still says what he means and means what he says Rove is a goner if he was involved.


19 posted on 07/11/2005 6:08:37 PM PDT by ex-snook (Protectionism is Patriotism in both war and trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Cripes! With all the corruption in the Clinton (off)White House, the Dems can only get outraged about this?!?!?!

Do FBI files, IRS persecutions and the occasional one way trip to Fort March park ring any bells?

Bush's only answer should be a flat "NO!" And maybe a few "big time" remarks "accidentally" uttered into an open mike...... ;-)

I second the Leahy remark too! Let Rove get the same punishment as Leahy!! LOL!


20 posted on 07/11/2005 6:09:36 PM PDT by SpinyNorman (Liberals are enablers for terrorists and other anti-American groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

anything these a$$holes say, you do and believe just the opposite.


22 posted on 07/11/2005 6:10:30 PM PDT by prophetic ("I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."--Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

Gee, I missed it when they asked Clinton to resign for perjury and obstruction of justice. Must've been at the mall that day.


23 posted on 07/11/2005 6:11:57 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

After nearly five years I'm growing bored with the left. They keep manufacturing scandal after scandal...that goes nowhere. Where's the thrill? It's entirely too predictable. I can't even keep track of their failures anymore.


24 posted on 07/11/2005 6:13:27 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson