Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
He suffers delusions of being President,...

So lets use it to our advanatge. let his poll numbers go up, give him the energy he needs to help carry Bushes nominations through, then we can get back to business. All contingent however on Bush nominating real Conservatives. Gonzales for Stevens, fine but not as one of the first two.

198 posted on 07/12/2005 7:33:55 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: Archon of the East

By my calculation, we need THREE conservatives selected to replace O'conner, Renquist, and TBD (Stevens, Ginsberg). Conservatives should settle for nothing less. Why should we?


204 posted on 07/12/2005 7:55:19 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: Archon of the East
"Gonzales for Stevens, fine but not as one of the first two."

I see where you're coming from, but couldn't disagree more. I say another Scalia for ANYONE who retires. The Dems wouldn't replace Thomas with an O'connor. They would use it as an opportunity to stick a Ginsberg in our faces and step on it hard and rub it in real, real good.

A Thomas, Scalia Justice for anyone who retires. Period.

225 posted on 07/12/2005 10:33:55 PM PDT by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson