Creating civil rights based on sexual behavior is not just an insult to true minorities, it opens to door to any sexual behavior.
The very existence of former homosexuals and what they have to say is very revealing. Checkout: People Can Change
1 posted on
07/12/2005 4:32:52 PM PDT by
scripter
To: little jeremiah
2 posted on
07/12/2005 4:33:05 PM PDT by
scripter
(Let temporal things serve your use, but the eternal be the object of your desire.)
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
What Scripter said needs to be repeated over and over again:
"Creating civil rights based on sexual behavior is not just an insult to true minorities, it opens to door to any sexual behavior."
Anyone who hasn't yet, please click his link. There are who knows how many thousands of former homosexuals. Their stories need to be heard.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
3 posted on
07/12/2005 4:37:36 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: scripter
4 posted on
07/12/2005 4:38:01 PM PDT by
scripter
(Let temporal things serve your use, but the eternal be the object of your desire.)
To: scripter
A group of 11 representatives in the House want Congress to add "sexual orientation" to the list of protected characteristics used in regulating workplace discrimination in federal employment.NO. Their salaries will be paid by us - the normal heterosexual tax payer.
I'm not supporting homosexuals who simply choose to engage in a demented sex fetish. I'll make my husband cut back on his work hours enough to fall into a no tax bracket. We're all set up to do that anyway in case of an emergency.
No fags!!
7 posted on
07/12/2005 4:44:24 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
To: scripter
"Someone needs to tell these congressmen that creating a special civil-rights status for federal employees based on bedroom behavior is an insult to true minorities," said Jan LaRue, Concerned Women for America's chief counsel. "Who are next, adulterers? And why should federal employees have greater civil-rights protection than ordinary, hard-working Americans?"BUMP
8 posted on
07/12/2005 4:45:54 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
To: scripter
I want protection from homosexual employees.
11 posted on
07/12/2005 4:52:33 PM PDT by
Peelod
(Decentia est fragilis. Curatoribus validis indiget.)
To: scripter
Lawmakers seek protection for homosexual employees
Supposedly any complainants will have to demonstrate and prove their hidden behavioral-minority status to some empowered panel.
To: scripter
"Someone needs to tell these congressmen that creating a special civil-rights status for federal employees based on bedroom behavior is an insult to true minorities,"EXACTLY!
31 posted on
07/12/2005 5:46:40 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: scripter
Creating civil rights based on sexual behavior is not just an insult to true minorities, it opens to door to any sexual behavior. You're right. Today give special rights to people based solely on who they choose to share their genitals with. Next, instead of "who", it will be "WHAT"...
33 posted on
07/12/2005 7:12:09 PM PDT by
BILLNHILL MAKE ME ILL
(Never forget our troops or what they are doing for us...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson