Skip to comments.
Judgment Day: President Bush should listen to his base, not his opponents - (Mark Levin!)
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE.COM ^
| JULY 12, 2005
| MARK R. LEVIN
Posted on 07/12/2005 5:16:24 PM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
07/12/2005 5:16:27 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
William Brennan, Lewis Powell, John Paul Stevens, and Sandra Day O'Connor.
____________________________________________________
All who had to be confirmed by Dim senates. This is a GOP senate. We do not need a stealth candidate. We need a GOP senators with guts.
I think we will get a nominee that will please us. To me the question is will the GOP senate do its job?
2
posted on
07/12/2005 5:22:21 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: CHARLITE
If Bush nominates Mark Levin and Alberto Gonzales at the same time, I could live with it. Especially with Ann Coulter in the on-deck circle.
3
posted on
07/12/2005 5:24:00 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
("There is no terrorist threat! There is no terrorist threat!" - Michael Moore)
To: CHARLITE
He will, this is far too important to him. His father was hoodwinked and he doesn't want to repeat. If Dubya had appointed a bunch of Liberals to the Appeals Court I would worry, but he appointed some of the finest judges out there, and he has never abandoned them, the Senate did, but not Dubya.
It wouldn't surprise me to see him appoint Luttig or Janice Rogers Brown (Brown is who I would pick)
4
posted on
07/12/2005 5:24:43 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: ThreePuttinDude; Beth528; SMARTY; CyberAnt; nothingnew; Cornpone; Blurblogger; ...
You're right. These current Republicans in the Senate aren't visibly and energetically supporting our president. Are they all tone deaf? Don't they hear the voices of George W. Bush's base........like us, for instance?
Surely there are top level RNC officials who read Free Republic, aren't there?
Char (:
5
posted on
07/12/2005 5:25:47 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
(I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
To: CHARLITE
Mark is right. Listen to his base! This will decide so much. I hope our President makes the decision good for our country and doesn't cowtow to the dem/libs.
6
posted on
07/12/2005 5:26:52 PM PDT
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know! :))
To: Question Liberal Authority
I say Bush should send over a list with these 5 names on it :-)
**** ATTENTION DEMOCRATS ****
Ann Coulter
Mark Levin
Ted Olsen
Janice Rogers Brown
Michael Luttig
**** YOU PICK! ****
7
posted on
07/12/2005 5:28:19 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: Question Liberal Authority
Mark Lavin YES...Gonzales NO.
8
posted on
07/12/2005 5:29:44 PM PDT
by
BMC1
To: CHARLITE
9
posted on
07/12/2005 5:30:23 PM PDT
by
trustandobey
(Delay 2008!)
To: MJY1288
Luttig or Janice Rogers Brown (Brown is who I would pickJanice Rogers Brown would be terrific. It is bogus to say that judges need seasoning on the Circuit bench before being elevated. She is brilliant, and that is enough. But if there is concern about that being a criticism. I think Luttig is solidly grounded and would be a great boon to this country.
10
posted on
07/12/2005 5:30:26 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Something wicked this way comes)
To: MJY1288
I agree with you, but the Dims seem to think W will appoint a moderate like they want cause Bush is ''meeting'' with them. Aren't they going to go absolutely ballistic if Bush as you say appoints an honest to goodness real conservative[I want Luttig] to the bench? Also do you think Bush is consulting with these creeps just to appease them cause its good politic? I hope so!
To: CHARLITE
Thanks to Mark Levin.
Accountability seems a bit impaired these days.
Guess we learned that from the Clintons.
12
posted on
07/12/2005 5:32:58 PM PDT
by
Spirited
To: JLS
President Bush should listen to his base, not his opponentsThat's a no brainer!
The American people came out in droves to support Bush because they wanted to stop the left wing activists on the benches. If Bush screws this one up, it'll prove the democrats were right - that he is stupid!
13
posted on
07/12/2005 5:36:10 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
To: JLS; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; jude24
Mark Levin pretty well says what needs to be said.
If this president with this Senate won't appoint those who honor the constitution, then who will and when and why? Those will be serious questions I ask myself if this goes awry.
14
posted on
07/12/2005 5:38:27 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: concerned about politics
That's a no brainer!
For us. For the numbskulls in D.C., it's a complicated matter.
To: Bush gal in LA
"I agree with you, but the Dims seem to think W will appoint a moderate like they want cause Bush is ''meeting'' with them"
Well, I don't think they are quite that stupid. More likely, they are hoping Bush will have a slip of the toungue and say something they can later use against him in the confirmation fight---or better yet, they will simply lie and make something up.
16
posted on
07/12/2005 5:38:36 PM PDT
by
strategofr
(What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
To: MJY1288
Brown should be the first pick.
One, she was just confirmed by the Senate. I would like to see the contortions the Dems would have to go through to fight her as a Supreme nominee after just having confirmed her to the Appellate court. It would show their true colors. And
Two, she would be a fantastic appointment.
17
posted on
07/12/2005 5:42:21 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: MJY1288
18
posted on
07/12/2005 5:42:48 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: CHARLITE
Amen. Preach it brother Mark!
19
posted on
07/12/2005 5:42:58 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson