Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: areafiftyone
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?
3 posted on 07/13/2005 12:03:11 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Darancette
"I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?"

That's what I thought, too. The Clintonistas kept leaking grand jury info and then blaming it on Kenneth Starr, and the media was all in an uproar about Starr. I don't know how this is different.
10 posted on 07/13/2005 12:08:57 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette; PatrickHenry
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?

There's no restriction on a GJ witness's ability to talk about his own testimony. The restriction is on revealing GJ testimony of anyone other than yourself, AFAIK.

14 posted on 07/13/2005 12:11:38 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?

Everything about a grand jury is cloaked in secrecy, and most jurisdictions make it a crime to violate that secrecy. In the federal system, for example, Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that "matters occurring before the grand jury" be kept secret. The rule also says that if anyone bound by secrecy reveals "matters occurring before" a grand jury, this is "CRIMINAL contempt." The rule of secrecy binds everyone with access to grand jury proceedings (prosecutors, grand jurors, court reporters, and clerical personnel who help a prosecutor prepare for grand jury appearances), except the witnesses who testify before a grand jury.

http://www.udayton.edu/~grandjur/faq/faq7.htm

See also http://www.ishipress.com/rule6e.htm <- Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
16 posted on 07/13/2005 12:13:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette

Don't you remember all the Clintonites who gave testimony coming out and immediately revealing their testimony? I do. Some of them even LIED about what happened, we later found out. They are allowed to talk about their own testimony, nothing else. In the case of Rove, he has said the prosecutor asked him not to discuss his testimony.


19 posted on 07/13/2005 12:19:53 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?

Exactly! Therefore, this person can fabricate a completely new story out of whole cloth and the prosecutor will not be able to dispute it. I couldn't figure out why he agreed to testify in the first place. Now I understand!

21 posted on 07/13/2005 12:24:24 PM PDT by Conservative Infidel (How come they call it "Tourist Season" if we can't shoot them??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette

The Special Prosecutor is forbidden by law from confirming or denying what was said. Cooper could leak. Just like the Dems leaked the Starr investigation.


40 posted on 07/13/2005 2:03:02 PM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Darancette
I thought what was said in a grand jury stays in a grand jury?

You may say whatever you want about your own Grand Jury testimony, but no one else may.

You're thinking Vegas =)

50 posted on 07/13/2005 2:44:33 PM PDT by pbear8 (Navigatrix, Tomas Torquemada Gentleman's Club - Ladies Auxiliary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson