I think that the better angle is that there's no apparent reason why Cooper and Miller would have to resist testimony if this is all there is. But it would appear from Rove's statements that the buzz about Valerie Plame originated from another journalist.
Or the other possibility is that Miller and or Cooper distorted what they were told.
I think you are right, but Cooper is in no way an "objective" journalist like the media is pretending.
I think you are right, but Cooper is in no way an "objective" journalist like the media is pretending.
In the original reports about this story, I do remember the claim that Rove said Plame was "fair game".
However, that means nothing, could have been Coopers or any other lamestream reporters own little special embellishment of the story.
I dont' know how Tony will verify if Rove actually said that or not. Personally, it sounds much more like lamestream injection.
The revelation of her 'source' has got to be so embarrassing and/or detrimental to a dem that she simply can't go that route.
By first demanding an independent prosecutor and now impeding his investigation, the role of the NEW YORK TIMES in this witch hunt needs to be investigated.