Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: Court Was 'Wrong' on Eminent Domain
NY Sun ^ | 7/14/05 | JOSH GERSTEIN

Posted on 07/14/2005 9:51:41 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

President Clinton yesterday added his voice to a growing chorus of Americans of various political persuasions who disagree with a recent Supreme Court ruling that upheld the government's use of eminent domain powers to take private property from one owner and give it to another.

Speaking to a conference of liberal college students, ...Clinton stated his disagreement with the court's decision last month, by a 5-4 vote, to allow a Connecticut city to carry out a redevelopment project by seizing 15 properties over the owners' objections.

...Clinton's views on the issue did not appear ironclad. After offering his assessment, he added, "I might be wrong." He also flubbed the name of the city involved, which was New London, not Norwalk.

In his speech, ...Clinton also criticized press coverage of statements his wife, Senator Clinton, has made recently in which she appeared to stray from a doctrinaire line advanced by abortion rights advocates...

"I wouldn't make that old lady in Norwalk sell her house," the former president said. "She was all 70 years or 80 years old. I thought it was wrong."

The former president used the example to illustrate his belief that few Americans are strictly orthodox in their political views. He said it was the first time he could remember agreeing with a dissent filed by two of the court's most conservative members, Justices Scalia and Thomas.

"I never thought it would happen," said ...Clinton, who once taught constitutional law... in Arkansas.

Property-rights activists, who have deplored the ruling, said they were delighted and not entirely surprised to have ...Clinton speak out against the decision.

"That underscores what we've seen since the opinion was announced, this outrage from liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats alike..." said Chip Miller, a spokesman for a conservative legal group, the Institute for Justice.

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: disgracedpresident; expresident; formerpresident; impeachedpresident; news; scumbag; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: nygoose

http://tancredo.house.gov/

http://coburn.senate.gov/

http://www.house.gov/norwood/

http://linder.house.gov/

I'm not saying you're entirely wrong, but here's some.


41 posted on 07/14/2005 10:06:34 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I just had a horrible horrible thought.

*IF* ThatWoman (D-NY) achieves her lifetime ambition, where would they put her "lie-brary"?

Suburban Chicago, where she was born? Little Rock? Westchester?

42 posted on 07/14/2005 10:07:03 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I would like to hear President Bush and the RNC speak out on Kelo. Letting the Clintons make hay with this issue while remaining silent is not doing the Republican Party any favors at all.
43 posted on 07/14/2005 10:07:14 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Clinton: Court Was 'Wrong' on Eminent Domain

And since your radical leftist judges put that decision into law, aren't you and your political philosophy wrong also?
44 posted on 07/14/2005 10:07:17 AM PDT by Vision (When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Clinton's views on the issue did not appear ironclad.


45 posted on 07/14/2005 10:07:31 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1

"Clinton, who once taught constitutional law... in Arkansas"

Isn't that both humorous and scary.


46 posted on 07/14/2005 10:07:49 AM PDT by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

The Bush Administration did not even file an amicus brief stating the government's position the case.


47 posted on 07/14/2005 10:07:50 AM PDT by IronMan04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: southlake_hoosier
http://www.cnsnews.com/Nation/Archive/200111/NAT20011102a.html

Demolition Looms for Landmark on Grounds of Clinton Library

By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
November 02, 2001

(CNSNews.com) - Time is running out for Arkansas preservationists who are battling to prevent the destruction of an African-American landmark located on the grounds of the future Clinton presidential library.

The city of Little Rock has boarded up the 103-year-old freight depot and stopped all historical fact-finding tours of the building. The Arkansas Supreme Court, meanwhile, ruled Thursday that the City of Little Rock had the right to condemn the property and take possession of it from the original owner Gene Pfeifer under eminent domain to make room for the Clinton library.

...

48 posted on 07/14/2005 10:08:03 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IronMan04

That tells us something doesn't it?

Either asleep at the wheel or supportive.


49 posted on 07/14/2005 10:08:54 AM PDT by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GregB

That is SO WRONG.

I have never ever ever ever never ever ever seen a hippo as ugly has Hillary.


50 posted on 07/14/2005 10:09:14 AM PDT by jsk10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The courts are slowly destroying what is good about America.
This nation will not last for long if things keep going the way of the judges.


51 posted on 07/14/2005 10:09:14 AM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777

LOL! Okay, I am putting on my "in general" hat :)

I disagree only in that the most useless man in America has no other thoughts in mind than his own legacy. I think that he thinks he helps his wife, but in true 21st century liberal fashion, this is only to help him feel good about himself rather than to actually help her.

Where he is concerned, what she has going for her is an arsenal of ashtrays and lamps to spike at him and that she knows where all of the bodies are buried.


52 posted on 07/14/2005 10:09:17 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Hey, it's MORE THAN BUSH SAID. Now that is pretty damn PATHETIC.


53 posted on 07/14/2005 10:09:21 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

and Clinton has the guts to say what he said.

He is just posturing for his future (UN Sec Gen) and his wife (Pres).


54 posted on 07/14/2005 10:10:17 AM PDT by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
*IF* ThatWoman (D-NY) achieves her lifetime ambition, where would they put her "lie-brary"?

The current site of the Library of Congress when she dismisses Congress and declares Herself Emperor.

55 posted on 07/14/2005 10:10:19 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Millee

??? I thought that they called him chIMPY McSMirk


56 posted on 07/14/2005 10:10:42 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Good. That's what I've been telling all my liberal family members, all who are outraged at the SCOTUS decision. The Liberals judges approved it, conservatives opposed it.

They get a light bulb going off for just a second, and then the liberal thoughtinator buzzes, and like Harrison Bergeron, they forget the had a lucid thought and go back to hating Bush.

57 posted on 07/14/2005 10:10:51 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Great find!!

This issues needs to be Bush's litmus test for any Judge he nominates. Beat the Dems over the head with it...It's a winner!


58 posted on 07/14/2005 10:11:30 AM PDT by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I think that we could find her a porcelain throne in the meanwhile.


59 posted on 07/14/2005 10:11:33 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
So were the Texas Rangers, when owned by GWB wrong when they condemned land to build a new ball park?
60 posted on 07/14/2005 10:11:52 AM PDT by IronMan04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson