Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
Miller makes some sense, actually. She was a journalist specializing in WMD. Plame worked in WMD. Washington is not that big a World, particularly in special areas like this. She could have known Plame, or known of Plame. Miller wouldn't want to reveal herself as the source..
It was reported by a Freeper that Brit Hume said the word from the Rove camp is that Rove learned where Joe Wilson's wife worked because a reporter told him. Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis Libby, also has testified that he learned it from a journalist. Here is an article I found recently:
Something doesn't add up about why Judith Miller went to jail. The New York Times reporter didn't write a story about the Valerie Plame case and had a waiver from her source in order to talk about it to the grand jury. But she insisted on going to jail anyway. Speculation is mounting that Miller is protecting herself, that Miller was herself a source of information about Plame that made it to several Bush administration officials and was then recycled to columnist Robert Novak. He, then, disclosed Plame's employment by the CIA and her role in arranging for her husband Joe Wilson's mission to Africa to investigate the Iraq-uranium link.This scenario was also backed up by the Washington Post:This would help explain why Miller didn't write a story about the case. It would be difficult for Miller to write a story when she was so deeply involved in how it developed. Disclosure of her role then or now would be extremely embarrassing.
The more likely explanation is that Miller is protecting private discussions with administration officials, and that during those discussions she provided or confirmed information about Plame's identity. This would make sense. Both Miller and Plame covered the subject of weapons of mass destruction and it was likely that they knew one another, or at least were aware of each other's work in this field.
Sources close to the investigation say there is evidence in some instances that some reporters may have told government officials -- not the other way around -- that Wilson was married to Plame, a CIA employee.
>>Bush said he would fire whoever was responsible.<<
Really. . .please provide the quote and source.
I hope Bush isn't going to play Ceasar and appoint Gonzales.
It's extremely interesting, since they claim that Rove is guilty of such high crimes that he should be fired. In the court briefs they claimed that no crime had been committed and that the investigation should be dropped.
You are very badly misinformed. Bush said there must be an illlegal action and there was none. There was no leak. There was an attempt to set a misguided soul on the correct path.
You may have a source for this, but if the RATS think this will work they are nuts.
It's not your business.
Either post something relevant to the subject, or move along.
"Dont expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections"
Of course not. that's understandable. Rove is under investigation, and after Bush makes his pics for the court, its up to the conservative, elected officials to see it through.
But remember, Sherman Adams, Eisenhowers' chief of staff who virtually ran the white house also became a liability because of some a contentious issue. And the battle with his political enemies wouldn't let it go. The dems have nothing else. Regardless of how Eisenhower felt about him and would continually publicly came out in support of him, Eisenhower began to understand that his legislative legacy" was going to be threatened by continuing to publicly support Adams as part of his administration. Adams resigned. I happened to cover this in my master's thesis.
Bush is in his second term. He wants to ensure that his influence of his presidency continues. Rove has done a wonderful job for Bush, but the Bush administration is bigger than any one man. If, and only if, Rove is found to outed Wilson's wife, and understood, or didn't understand the lawful implications, he should resign. Bush can then focus on upcoming elections, his court nominations, and the war on terror. Rove can then focus on ensuring other conservatives are elected.
LOL! Now THAT is funny!
Sounds like a reliable bird to me.
Not really. With age comes wisdom!
It's extremely interesting, since they claim that Rove is guilty of such high crimes that he should be fired. In the court briefs they claimed that no crime had been committed and that the investigation should be dropped.
--
Where are those court briefs and why have not our big guns talked about this. This is key in the double standard? Got the link? I would love to use it on my blog. I believe we need to use that in our talking points.. you know..
"If this case is so important, they why did your companies ask for the case to be dismissed?"
I really have a feeling that Rush was right and that Schumer is nothing more than a handler - that this is a REAL conspiracy to take down Bush and do as much damage to the GOP as possible.
The question is, do other GOP senators and reps get how important of a fight this is?
I mean, to me, I am not really scared of what they are saying because its weak. Notice how the msm and dems are moving off of their core/beginning talking points and are going on to others.. We must confront this and take care of it.
The MSM has been all over the place mis-representing Bush's quote on this. I saw the original wording this morning, but can't find it right now.
It goes something like "I will deal with whoever leaked this, whoever broke the law". The MSM has been quoting the first part and leaving out the second.
Typical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.