Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Approves Costly Waterway Improvements
Madison.com via AP Wire ^ | July 15, 2005 | John Helprin

Posted on 07/15/2005 4:01:22 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

WASHINGTON - The House voted Thursday to approve the nation's costliest waterway navigation project, a $3.6 billion undertaking to ease shipping on the upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers. Environmental and taxpayer groups have opposed the project.

Barge operators and farmers want to speed grain to Gulf of Mexico ports, and the Mississippi is the cheapest route for shipping to export markets commodities such as corn and soybeans, coal, chemicals and construction materials.

Government scientists, however, had said that grain exports probably won't increase enough to economically justify the lock overhaul plan. House members overwhelmingly agreed to the plan anyway, as part of a bill to authorize spending $10 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects nationwide over the next 15 years.

"If a project is broke, it's time to fix it," said Rep. Kenny Hulshof, R-Mo. "You don't wait to see if it gets better. Traffic has been increasing on the inland waterways system everywhere except in the upper Mississippi because of the declining condition of these locks and dams."

"We do not need another study, we do not need further delay," agreed Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill.

The bill, giving lawmakers' districts in nearly every state an economic boost, passed by a 406-14 vote. Fourteen members did not vote. Senate consideration of an $11.7 billion version is expected later this summer.

"It is not fiscally conservative to let certain assets deteriorate," said Rep. John Duncan, R-Tenn., chairman of a House subcommittee on water resources and environment.

Before the vote, the White House urged the House to approve the lock overhaul project only if states share half the costs, as with the 30-year, $8.4 billion Florida Everglades restoration effort.

The House bill authorizes spending $1.8 billion to replace older locks that can slow some barges by up to two hours, $1.58 billion for ecosystem restoration and $235 million to improve several upstream locks.

Skeptics pointed to a decline in barge traffic by more than a third since 15 years ago.

"Traffic on the river is not going up," said Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., who with Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., tried unsuccessfully to require more economic justifications before the project could proceed. Two reports from the National Academy of Sciences, issued last October and December 2003, said the Army Corps didn't make a good enough case for it.

An academy panel in 2000 recommended the Army Corps submit all project studies for review by outside experts. That came after an Army Corps economist accused agency officials of doctoring a $54 million study of the Mississippi's navigation system to justify expanding the barge locks. The Army's inspector general also concluded the Army Corps tilted its analysis to favor Midwestern agribusiness interests.

"Pork is king. That's what this bill is cobbled together with," said Steve Ellis, a vice president of the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense, which counted 757 separate projects and studies in the $10 billion bill.

Other major projects include $1 billion in coastal Louisiana projects mainly aimed at slowing erosion, $605 million for the Everglades and $512 million to fix Gulf of Mexico hurricane and storm damage.


TOPICS: Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 109th; rivers
"$1.58 BILLION for ecosystem restoration...Other major projects include $1 billion in coastal Louisiana projects mainly aimed at slowing erosion, $605 million for the Everglades and $512 million to fix Gulf of Mexico hurricane and storm damage."

And the EnviroWackos STILL have the balls to not accept that graciously and say, "Thank you!"

And excuse me...but where do Senators from states that have no water get off on the country wanting to IMPROVE waterways to benefit us all?

Or am I totally off base here, and it's just another boondoggle at my expense? (Don't answer that, LOL!)

1 posted on 07/15/2005 4:01:23 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I can stomach improves to the locks and stuff for the rivers, but improving the ecosystem in Louisiana and stopping erosion?

NOT....


2 posted on 07/15/2005 4:07:18 PM PDT by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1442988/posts


3 posted on 07/15/2005 4:07:26 PM PDT by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Let's review this headline for a minute:

WASHINGTON - The House voted Thursday to approve the nation's costliest waterway navigation project, a $3.6 billion undertaking to ease shipping on the upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers.

This does not even come close to what is, in fact, the "nation's costliest waterway navigation project"

That is $13.6 Billion Dollars (US) spent on the BIG DIG in Boston to connect Bostonians to their POS airport out in the harbor. The Beached Whale, Ted Kennedy, rode this project through and stuffed it down the throats of American citizens, after promising that costs would stay in the area of $2.5 Billion Dollars, and then sent the American Tax Payer the tab for the overrun, more than $10,000,000,000.

Ted Kennedy is a criminal.


4 posted on 07/15/2005 4:36:00 PM PDT by joem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joem15

"Ted Kennedy is a criminal."

Certainly can't disagree with you, there. ;) Wisconsin socialists tend to take their cue from Uncle Teddy. In fact, quite a few of them have been tried and sent to jail in recent years.

Guess Wisconsin isn't blind enough to government corruption...yet. :(


5 posted on 07/15/2005 4:42:57 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
I can stomach improves to the locks and stuff for the rivers, but improving the ecosystem in Louisiana and stopping erosion?

Umm..if you don't stop erosion much of Louisiana isn't going to exist in a few decades.

6 posted on 07/15/2005 6:48:43 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I know that, but the real question is SHOULD WE be messed with something that is going to naturally occur?


7 posted on 07/16/2005 9:13:04 AM PDT by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson