Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecute Plame: More Treachery in the War at Home
frontpagemag.com ^ | July 16, 2005 | DAVID HOROWITZ

Posted on 07/16/2005 8:20:46 PM PDT by DaveTesla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-217 next last
To: Auntie Dem

LOL! Not much of a cover driving a plutocrat car like that.


61 posted on 07/16/2005 9:45:57 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
Who is investigating the Clintons? Why are they being investiagted now?

Hillary HAS to run,so as to not be indicted if they find something. NO ONE will ever indict a Presidential candidate....short of murder with witnesses.

62 posted on 07/16/2005 9:46:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: True_wesT
Plame demanded, in an oh so COVERT way, that Wilson be sent./ She hadn't the power to send him, but made sure and certain that he WAS sent there.

Whilst there, Wilson, in his own words, sat around drinking tea with a few old pals, came back home, wrote a worthless report for the CIA,wrote a Bush-bashing op-ed for the N.Y. Times, wrote a book to discredit the president his administration, Tony Blair and his people ( including England's spy team ), went to work for John F'in Kerry, and has spent the last two years going on T.V. to try to bring down President Bush.

Okay, now tell me, again, WHY are you "standing up" for this guy.

63 posted on 07/16/2005 9:47:41 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

Well, at least here, it appears I'm the only one! Since I'm on the east coast and it's getting late, let me just say (1)personally, I'll wait for Fitzgerald to finish his investigation; (2) the Bush presidency is in no danger -- there's no reason for impeachment and no way any trumped up charges would make it through the House; and (3)put me on any list you want, but I still think Horowitz is not being reasonable here.


64 posted on 07/16/2005 9:48:02 PM PDT by RustysGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I'm almost at a loss for words. LOL


65 posted on 07/16/2005 9:48:34 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla
I have come to the conclusion that there is way more about the Iraq war and the RATS than the White House is letting us know. The RATS are with the enemy, they are doing everything in their power to help the Islamofascists and daring this administration to do something about it. If what Newt says is true and no charges are pressed it is because the RATS are holding a trump card of some kind. WE are talking about the life and death of this country and what the RATS are doing to hurt the effort is beyond pale. How anyone can vote for a demoRAT after the past two years is beyond me, it's like a death-wish to keep them in power.
66 posted on 07/16/2005 9:49:17 PM PDT by John Lenin (The Clinton's must go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I'm almost at a loss for words. LOL

Maybe they don't get enough fiber. :-)

67 posted on 07/16/2005 9:50:33 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Rove is not a target of the investigation so who is Miller protecting --Wilson and/or his wife perhaps?

Yep. If she doesn't cover for them, she'll be getting a visit from the Arkansas Chinese mafia. The left has invested a LOT in these scams, so if someone ruins it, they'll bring down the entire democrat party with them. They're as good as dead.

68 posted on 07/16/2005 9:50:55 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

LOL...maybe they should try some prunes. :-)


69 posted on 07/16/2005 9:52:20 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RustysGirl

Obviously, you have NO idea WHO David Horowtiz is. Pity that.;^)


70 posted on 07/16/2005 9:54:27 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Calm down, sparkplug. I'm not "standing up" for Wilson. But nothing is gained by exaggerating the facts, which Horowitz (a man I greatly respect) is doing in his article.

From everything I can glean, Wilson came back with evidence that appeared to bolster the President's position. Only later did he lie about his findings.

But saying flatly that Plame sent Wilson is just untrue, and saying this discredits our position. Yes, Plame recommended her husband because she thought the uranium story was "crazy," but ultimately a person of higher authority made the call. But, as Novak originally wondered, why would someone in the administration send an a skeptical enemy to investigate the uranium claim? And as Rove confirmed, they didn't.
71 posted on 07/16/2005 9:54:39 PM PDT by True_wesT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: zip

ping


72 posted on 07/16/2005 9:54:48 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
What a shocker to the left loonies that would be!

Imagine. Two such shocks in less than a year!!

Kerry Concedes.

73 posted on 07/16/2005 9:54:48 PM PDT by syriacus (To WHICH entity does Joe Wilson pledge his allegiance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
using the Plame-Wilson lies to undermine the authority of the commander-in-chief in the eyes of the American people and before the entire world. No psychological warfare campaign ever conducted by an enemy against the United States has been as effetive as this one.

You don't think this is a bit exaggerrated?

74 posted on 07/16/2005 9:55:17 PM PDT by RustysGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: balch3

"They indict one of ours, then we indict one of theirs."

...then we indict at least two of theirs!


75 posted on 07/16/2005 9:56:59 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Call me crazy, but I think it wouldn't hurt for them to have a Karl Rove PR campaign. Hear me out. WE know that he's a decent and honorable man, but most of the public only knows what they see in the MSM. How about a few stories about Karl's background, interviews with family and friends talking about what a great guy he is, press releases of him visiting troops, even. Humanize him, in other words. It's a lot harder to think the worst of somebody you like than somebody you don't like.

It's fine to let the grand jury take its course (although I'm skeptical about it being impartial). But this battle is fought on many fronts, and one of them is public relations. Couldn't hurt.


76 posted on 07/16/2005 9:58:06 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem

lol, v good v good


77 posted on 07/16/2005 9:58:54 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (whats wrong with a draft?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
LOL...maybe they should try some prunes. :-)

Some sure do seem to have a constipated attitude.

78 posted on 07/16/2005 9:59:30 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RustysGirl
I looked at your posts.
"Rove is a master strategist. Still, the White House really shouldn't let him out in public."

Showed op after almost 7 months to attack Rove?
Think the war is un-winnable?

Go back to DU TROLL
79 posted on 07/16/2005 10:00:09 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RustysGirl
I realize the author is trying to cheer up the base, rally the Republican troops, but his assertions, as I said, are not reasonable.

Do you know who David Horowitz is? His background and transformation from radical leftist from the Viet Nam days, makes his comments not only perfectly reasonable but probably more insightful than those who simply chalk this up to old fashioned American politics.

80 posted on 07/16/2005 10:00:10 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson