Posted on 07/17/2005 10:34:22 PM PDT by ttsmi
That three of the suspected perpetrators of the bomb attacks on London on July 7 were British youths of Pakistani origin should not only have been no surprise to British intelligence, it should have been anticipated: the radicalization of Britain's Muslim youth of Pakistani origin began in the mid-1990s with the full knowledge and complicity of British and US intelligence agencies. According to estimates, about 200 Muslims of Pakistani origin living in the United Kingdom went to Pakistan, received training in the camps of the HUA, and joined the HUA in Bosnia with the blessings of London and Washington. Among them was Omar Sheikh, who went on to mastermind the murder of US journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002.
(Excerpt) Read more at atimes.com ...
Translation - no one is responsible for their own actions and everything is the fault of either the Americans, the British or the Joos.
The US helped muslims throw the Russians out of Afghanistan, and as a consequence the muslims roam the world attacking any and all.
Britain and the US helped muslims throw the Serbs out of Bosnia, and as a result muslims roam the world attacking any and all.
Britain has relaxed immigration standards for Pakistanis, and Britain becomes a safe haven for them, and so obviously muslims must attack them.
Its like the story of the frog and the scorpion. The scorpion asks the frog for help, saying "why would I hurt you? I need you". So the frog helps him, the scorpion stings him, saying "hey, I'm a scorpion, what did you expect".
The writers point is essentially that. They are muslims, what did you expect.
That is an absolute lie as far as bin Laden is concerned. Not one dime, not one penny of our money went into bin Laden's pocket during the Soviet's occupation of the Soviet Union. I guess I'll put the author on the American-hating ignore list.
Thanks for remembering that.
A decade before Bosnia, the CIA had raised and funded a large corps of jihadis of Arab origin - including Osama bin-Laden - to help the Afghan mujahideen in their jihad against Soviet troops in Afghanistan in the 1980s.
___________________________________________________________
That is an absolute lie as far as bin Laden is concerned. Not one dime, not one penny of our money went into bin Laden's pocket during the Soviet's occupation of the Soviet Union. I guess I'll put the author on the American-hating ignore list
___________________________________________________________
Well spotted. I went into a twenty minute rant at a friend last week after he told me the US funded Bin Laden. It was teh Saudis that funded him.
Translation - no one is responsible for their own actions and everything is the fault of either the Americans, the British or the Joos.
Left out Halliburton and Carl Rove...but I guess no one is going to touch HIM again for a while!! hahahaha
Tom
Even if that contention were true -- that kind of reasoning drives me nuts. It is the same as arguing that if you give money to some person to help someone else and then 7 years later that person murders somebody, you are responsible for the murder. That is a ridiculous position to take. And in fact it is so ridiculous that I have to believe the people who make the argument are doing so for no other reason than that they want to see the United States hamstrung from ever taking any kind of affirmative action against our enemies.
ping
thanks again to Bubba picking the wrong side in an "illegal war" in Bosnia
Muslim's have been attacking U.S. interest for at 50 years that I personally know of and probably a lot longer.
Thomas Jefferson had to deal with Muslim pirates (AKA Barbary Pirates) in the Mediteranian in the 1800's.
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/jefferson_papers/mtjprece.html
There you go!!!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.