Skip to comments.
Drug Busts Hit Students Hard (WI Druggies Lose Financial Aid)
Madison.com ^
| July 18, 2005
| Megan Doughty
Posted on 07/18/2005 12:38:06 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Of course, I can't pick up that kind of slack," Bush said, adding that state aid covers only about half of the $15,000 a year he pays for his education. "So it all just falls on my parents, which I'm not proud of. But I just can't come up with that kind of money."Not this parent!
If my kids partied or got crummy grades, or got caught with drugs, they would be SOL. Permanently, no second chances. Period.
41
posted on
07/18/2005 1:25:09 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: John Robertson
He can't pick up that kind of slack, but he managed to afford the drugs... And the legalization proponents say that Marijuana doesn't damage the brain... /sarcasm off
On a serious note, I say that this is a great idea. My 4 kids worked hard and stayed drug free to get through college and I don't know why we should be giving financial aid to the druggies.
To: Nov3
Now really... if your stupid enough to be driving around with your bong on the front seat, are you REALLY college material?
And besides, whatever happened to paying for your own damn college, anyway?
43
posted on
07/18/2005 1:30:13 PM PDT
by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Students who receive taxpayer dollars to go to college are not making the most of it by taking drugs," Green said. Hmmm, is he sure? I used to know a grad student in a math program down in Texas who has trouble getting any work done unless he took a few puffs. He said it helped him "visualize" the math problems.
Whether it did or not, I looked him up on the internet recently, and it looks like he's done alright for himself.
The law seems inconsistent, to say the least. First of all, why a complete loss of funds? Why not treat it like a fine, deducting a certain amount of aid depending on the severity of the crime? All-or-nothing approaches are like slegdehammers, but sometimes you need a dremel tool.
44
posted on
07/18/2005 1:40:35 PM PDT
by
seacapn
To: seacapn
I too have known many outstanding students who 'indulged' a bit during undergrad/grad school. I think this is a stupid policy.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Any bets there's already an exemption in place for illegal aliens?
46
posted on
07/18/2005 1:47:27 PM PDT
by
null and void
(You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Of course, I can't pick up that kind of slack," Bush said, adding that state aid covers only about half of the $15,000 a year he pays for his education. "So it all just falls on my parents, which I'm not proud of. But I just can't come up with that kind of money."Things that make you go......"Hahahahahaha!"
FMCDH(BITS)
47
posted on
07/18/2005 2:01:44 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: John Robertson
"Of course, I can't pick up that kind of slack," Bush said, adding that state aid covers only about half of the $15,000 a year he pays for his education. "So it all just falls on my parents, which I'm not proud of. But I just can't come up with that kind of money."
Get a job or jobs and take out loans dopey!
(Pun not intended)
48
posted on
07/18/2005 2:14:21 PM PDT
by
Beaker
To: somniferum
If the student is spending the cash on non school related things then his funding should get yanked. If he has plenty of cash to buy things not for school (drugs, booze, cars, beanie babies, whatever) then he's getting too much money from taxpayers.
49
posted on
07/18/2005 2:14:54 PM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: tfecw
Thats an interesting line of reasoning. Should they also deny aid to students who smoke tobacco?
To: cspackler
Now really... if your stupid enough to be driving around with your bong on the front seat, are you REALLY college material? First, it is "you're" not "your" in that usage. Did you get caught with a bong or a joint?? Second he had a 3.8 in high school.
I can't understand people who cannot see that this is moronic. He could have raped and pillaged, and he would get financial aid, but to get caught with a bong? MAYBE if he were dealing, but to deprive him of aid because he was catching a buzz at 18 years old is ridiculous. We want productive members of society to pay our social security, not burger flippers.
And besides, whatever happened to paying for your own damn college, anyway?
The same thing that happened to self paying your medical bills. The government got involved and the costs skyrocketed.
51
posted on
07/18/2005 3:11:18 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: somniferum
Thats an interesting line of reasoning. Should they also deny aid to students who smoke tobacco? By his reasoning - yes. This forum goes farther downhill everyday.
52
posted on
07/18/2005 3:15:35 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: somniferum
"Thats an interesting line of reasoning. Should they also deny aid to students who smoke tobacco?"
Depending on the state and how much pot you smoke, smokes (tobacco) are going to cost less than pot. Some of my friends were heavy pot smokers so they were spending a lot more than I was on ciggs, others only smoked once every month or two.
Smoking is wasteful as is getting pizza on Friday night (Ramon noodles are so much cheaper) and so on. I had fun in college and feel there is more to it than sitting in the library 24/7 because you are on government money.
It is harder to justify applying for government money after you just bought a brand new car, or have all designer clothes and 200 pounds of gold chains around your neck. Obviously I don't want the government tracking your purchases or auditing kids, but it is an interesting line of thought.
I like to avoid all these complications and just have the feds stop handing out money to everyone that asks. ;)
53
posted on
07/18/2005 3:18:42 PM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: tfecw
Thanks for the clarification.
The thing I would like to see tied to recieving fed money is higher performance standards. I haven't perused the FAFSA policies in a while, but (correct me if I am wrong anyone), the 'satisfactory academic progress' standard was something like a 1.0 GPA to remain elliglbe for aid. Contrast that to a state grant that I recieved which required a 3.5 cumulative GPA to remain eligible.
To: Nov3
The same thing that happened to self paying your medical bills. The government got involved and the costs skyrocketed.I worked my way through college, paid for it all myself. If you want to serve off of the government, pay the consequences. Or, just get a job and work for it.
And no, never got caught with a bong, I was too busy working 40 hours a week and studying to waste my time doing it.
55
posted on
07/18/2005 5:31:38 PM PDT
by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: Nov3
The government got involved and the costs skyrocketed.And no, the government doesn't pay my health insurance, either. I do that myself as well.
56
posted on
07/18/2005 5:32:54 PM PDT
by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: cspackler
I don't think you understand the basic concept.
57
posted on
07/18/2005 6:01:13 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: Nov3
Oh, but I do. So many people seem to think that they are "owed" something. This kid was being given aid to attain his personal education through my and your tax money. He got busted being stupid, and got his free ride yanked away, and now he feels as though he is being "denied" something as if it were his "right" to have in the first place. What he had was a precious gift of help to attain an education, and he pissed it away. Sorry, no sympathy from a guy who busted his balls working 40 hours a week to pay for his own education.
He should suck it up and get a job, he might just appreciate what he screwed up a little more.
58
posted on
07/18/2005 7:46:40 PM PDT
by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: cspackler
59
posted on
07/18/2005 7:47:58 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: Nov3
Well then, thanks for clearing that up so succinctly.
60
posted on
07/18/2005 7:49:37 PM PDT
by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson