Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
On the other hand, your pose, feigning concern for taxpayers, is not too terribly well done.

Are you suggesting that I am indifferent to the amount of taxes that I, or we, pay? That is the logical outcome of your reasoning.

And neither is this disingenuous attempt at labelling all opposition as being some sort of union ploy.

Give it a rest. I responded to the following comment:

Labor unions, including the AFL/CIO, say CAFTA will result in a net loss of U.S. jobs, and that the agreement fails to provide adequate education or job training for those left unemployed.

I merely pointed out that the above statement is correct. Disingenuous, indeed.

54 posted on 07/19/2005 11:41:55 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

"I merely pointed out that the above statement is correct. Disingenuous, indeed."

You "merely" attempt to tar conservative opposition to your pet treaty by association with the AFL/CIO. Indeed, disingenuous.


55 posted on 07/19/2005 11:44:45 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson