[Political Junkie Too]

There is no strategic value to bombing Mecca even after a devastating attack on the U.S. In fact, such an action would be a strategic blunder without historical parallel...

He speaks of a devastating attack on the U.S. If the attack is truly "devastating," what kind of response would you expect? Furthermore, if you wanted to prevent a "devastating" attack by suggesting an equally "devastating" attack of no strategic value to us, then the coupling of "devastating" attacks becomes strategic, unless cooler heads prevail.

-PJ

[Mo1]

He speaks of a devastating attack on the U.S. If the attack is truly "devastating," what kind of response would you expect?

I would expect a swift and deadly response ..

but an elected official shouldn't go shooting off his fat mouth and putting our military in any more danger then they are already in

Tancredo should shut up and let the military do their job

THEY are the trained professionals .. not some politician up in Congress