Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Bush most India-friendly US President'
Sify.com ^ | Tuesday, 19 July , 2005, 14:55 | Sify.com

Posted on 07/19/2005 5:52:21 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick

Washington's decision to reopen access for India to civil nuclear technology is another example of the Bush administration's engagement of the South Asian nation as a counterweight to China, Indian analysts said on Tuesday. "People have it in their minds that in Asia it should not be a wholly China-dominated scene," former Indian foreign secretary Salman Haider told AFP.

"Japan has become more assertive and we are seen as a potential counter balance. Whether it should take the form of rivalry with China, that's a separate question. I think the United States would like to bring us into play (vis-a-vis China)."

China and India are the world's fastest growing economies. While China is an established Asian giant, India, with its seven percent growth rate in 2004, is seen as an emerging power.

But for India the issue of energy is becoming more and more important as it attempts to power the needs of its billion-plus population and fuel its booming economy.

President George W Bush said after a meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Washington on Monday that he would ask Congress and allied nations to lift sanctions preventing Indian access to civil nuclear technology.

Washington had imposed sanctions on India after its second round of nuclear tests in May 1998, but agreed after the September 11, 2001 attacks to waive those and other sanctions in return for support in the "war on terrorism".

However, because India is not party to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, it is precluded under a US law from receiving technology that could aid its nuclear programme.

But Bush said he would "seek agreement from Congress to adjust US laws and policies" and work with "friends and allies to adjust international regimes" for such co-operation and trade with India.

"I think this agreement to reopen civil nuclear technology is perhaps the most significant aspect of what transpired in Washington," said former Indian ambassador to Pakistan G. Parthasarthy.

"The United States was claiming that it wanted India to be a partner and yet had imposed sanctions on India on nuclear space and hi-technology transfers that were far more stringent than on China.

"So any kind of partnership was meaningless unless these were removed. It's the first step in that direction... Full credit to President Bush. He is the friendliest president India has had in the White House."

Parthasarthy said the developments should be viewed in the context of "the emerging Asian balance of power (in which) the United States sees India as a partner".

Last month the countries signed a 10-year defence agreement paving the way for joint weapons production, co-operation on missile defense and a possible lifting of US export controls for sensitive military technologies.

Earlier this year, Washington offered sophisticated F-16 fighter jets to India following up on its declaration that it would like to help India become a major power in the 21st century.

US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, while briefing reporters on the Bush-Singh talks, described the Indian prime minister's trip as "one of the most important visits of this year".

"We consider India to be one of our most important partners worldwide... We've never had a relationship in nearly 60 years with India like the one we have now established," he added, according to a release by the US embassy in New Delhi.

President Bush is slated to visit India within the next year.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinanukeamerica; chinathreat; counterweight; democracy; economy; india; us

1 posted on 07/19/2005 5:52:22 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Contrast it with Clinton who was China's best friend. After all, China still IS America's official 'Most Favored Nation', isn't it?


2 posted on 07/19/2005 5:53:47 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Good point. Strategically I'm not really sure why the West would want to trade with China rather than India. India is a democracy China is not. Freepers should fill on with this. Why doesn't the US and other countries forget about trading with China and focus on India. They have just as much people as China.


3 posted on 07/19/2005 6:28:57 AM PDT by youngtory (Kick the Red Tories out of the Conservative Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Bush's acceptance of Indian nuclear weapons is going to cause some problems with Pakistan. We may be getting a new enemy as well as a new friend.


4 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:13 AM PDT by Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Our_Man_In_Gough_Island

Screw Pakistan. They should be happy they were not turned into a parking lot after 9/11 and were let alone after A.Q.Khan.


5 posted on 07/19/2005 7:00:14 PM PDT by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson