Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1


High stakes game of poker was played today, and Bush bluffs all-in, the Dems fold.

Bush shows just one pair..


A PAIR OF BALLS!!


4 posted on 07/19/2005 5:08:05 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Josh in PA

Roberts shouls be able to come close to his mentor, Rehnquist, in terms of longevity on the SC..He's a 30 year man...and look for some future GOP president to move him up to CJ


7 posted on 07/19/2005 5:10:16 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Josh in PA
Some say W "swaggers".
Here in Texas, we call it "walking".

Beat 'em up, W!

10 posted on 07/19/2005 5:10:45 PM PDT by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Josh in PA
Woo Hoo! Bush gets a doublr thumbs-up!!

While working as White House counsel and a former deputy solicitor for Ken Starr, Roberts supposed a hard-line, anti-civil rights policy that opposed affirmative action, would have made it nearly impossible for minorities to prove a violation of the Voting Rights Act and would have resegregated public schools. He also took strongly anti-choice positions in two Supreme Court cases, one that severely restricted the ability of poor women to gain information about abortion services, and another that took away a key means for women to and clinics to combat anti-abortion zealots.

As Deputy Solicitor General, Roberts argued in a brief before the Supreme Court that "we continue to believe that Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled. The Court's conclusion in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion...finds no support in the text, structure, or history of the Constitution."

As Deputy Solicitor General, Roberts filed an amicus curiae brief in support of Operation Rescue and individuals who routinely blocked access to clinics. The brief argued that the protesters' behavior did not discriminate against women and that blockades and clinic protests were protected speech under the First Amendment.

http://poplicks.com/2005/07/supreme-court-justice-john-g-roberts.html

82 posted on 07/19/2005 5:19:45 PM PDT by Boondock_Saint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Josh in PA
Texas sized.........and pure platinum........I'm grateful and sure that lots of prayer works........
141 posted on 07/19/2005 5:25:35 PM PDT by marmar (Even though I may look different then you...my blood runs red, white and blue.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson