Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Nominates Federal Judge Roberts
Associated Press ^ | July 19, 2005 | By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 07/19/2005 5:12:34 PM PDT by Bogeygolfer

WASHINGTON - President Bush chose federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. on Tuesday as his first nominee for the Supreme Court, selecting a rock solid conservative whose nomination could trigger a tumultuous battle over the direction of the nation's highest court, senior administration officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: johnroberts; roberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2005 5:12:35 PM PDT by Bogeygolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: easymoney

What does everyone know on this fellow.. Good solid in what ways?


2 posted on 07/19/2005 5:14:31 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush (Alabama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

Who leaked it??


3 posted on 07/19/2005 5:14:32 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Senate Dems- striving for a level of petulance and immaturity seen only in pre schools..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Karl Rove & Robert Novak of course!


4 posted on 07/19/2005 5:17:15 PM PDT by GreyFriar (3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
This is a quote from John Roberts Jnr

"The decision of Row vs Wade is wrong"
5 posted on 07/19/2005 5:17:29 PM PDT by danny5555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Bet it wasn't Karl Rove.


6 posted on 07/19/2005 5:17:41 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

If you go with what Drudge has (a quote from Roberts concerning Roe v Wade), then we have a BIG fight coming.

Let the games begin!

I'll guarantee you that DC won't have enough Chivas for ol' Teddy tonight!


7 posted on 07/19/2005 5:18:03 PM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

LOL!!


8 posted on 07/19/2005 5:18:36 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Senate Dems- striving for a level of petulance and immaturity seen only in pre schools..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

In his defense, Roberts told senators during his 2003 confirmation hearing that he would be guided by legal precedent. "Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. ... There is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."


9 posted on 07/19/2005 5:19:55 PM PDT by topgun333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

http://www.usdoj.gov/olp/robertsbio.htm

take a look ...


10 posted on 07/19/2005 5:19:58 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
President Bush chose federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. on Tuesday as his first nominee for the Supreme Court

The old media draws a line in the sand,there's' only one opening.

11 posted on 07/19/2005 5:20:10 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

Does anyone know where this guy stands on the personal rights secured by the Second Amendment?


12 posted on 07/19/2005 5:20:21 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
After listening all day to talk radio blather about the moderate "selection" of Judge Clements (sp) I am relieved he is picking a conservative nominee

To the Democrats I say:

BRING IT ON

13 posted on 07/19/2005 5:20:26 PM PDT by Popman (In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

No matter who gets picked, it won't be a liberal/socialist activist, so the Dems will not like it.

Accept it, and get ready for more BS than a beef farm can generate....!!!!


14 posted on 07/19/2005 5:20:42 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

Let me be among the first to say Crow is fight tuff eating, but mine is simmering on the stove.


15 posted on 07/19/2005 5:21:06 PM PDT by itsahoot (Reagan promised to abolish the Dept of Education and the 55 mph Limit. Which was least important?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

"Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land."

That contradicts his other comments about Roe v. Wade as being "wrong"


16 posted on 07/19/2005 5:21:48 PM PDT by topgun333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David

This is a super choice......... all the way down the line. Conservatives should be ecstatic!!


17 posted on 07/19/2005 5:22:27 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

fight=mighty :~)


18 posted on 07/19/2005 5:23:36 PM PDT by itsahoot (Reagan promised to abolish the Dept of Education and the 55 mph Limit. Which was least important?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: topgun333

Ruling on the appellate court is a completely different issue than ruling on the Supreme court. The appeals court follows precident, the Supreme Court sets precident.


19 posted on 07/19/2005 5:24:14 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

I'm glad it's not Gonzales. Go Bush!


20 posted on 07/19/2005 5:25:37 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topgun333

It is being said that he will uphold RoeVWade and President Bush is well aware of that, and it is being said President Bush did not make RoeVWade his priority when choosing Roberts.
On the plus side Roberts was instrumental in getting the President elected during the infamous vote count.


21 posted on 07/19/2005 5:26:02 PM PDT by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: topgun333
As a judge in a lower court, no doubt he must view Roe v. Wade and associated rulings by the SCOTUS to be "settled law".

As a Supreme Court Justice he has no obligation whatsoever to recognize Roe v. Wade as anything other than the trash it really is.

22 posted on 07/19/2005 5:26:25 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: topgun333

I am so happy that he is going to back up wrong decisions. Hewitt says he has great "mainstream credentials". That should make all of us warm and fuzzie. I guess he makes great mainstream laws out of whole cloth. I sure hope he is not another Souter.


23 posted on 07/19/2005 5:26:55 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

I read the article and it appears that Roberts was speaking not for himself or a group of judges. He was stating the position of the first Bush administration in an abortion case brief - which he won. So he has an easy out that he was merely restating the administration's existing policy. Libs will still scream.


24 posted on 07/19/2005 5:27:03 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ikemeister

If Roe v Wade is overturned (and it should be because it is not a right guaranteed in the constitution) we will all then simply get the chance to vote on it in our individual states. This would be called 'law making' and is commonly used in a democracy. I suspect many states will allow abortion with some restrictions attached (not after 4 months for example) while other states will not allow it at all...analagous to the death penalty. A federal law might trump any state law but, a law it will be, not a dictum sent down from on high by 9 judges.

The left likes to claim that president Bush was 'selected' back in 2000. This is laughable, however; it is quite obvious the supreme court 'selected' abortion when an election on this matter was what was needed.


25 posted on 07/19/2005 5:27:14 PM PDT by Firefox1 (Robert's as Judge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
YEEE-HAAAA!

BATTLE!

26 posted on 07/19/2005 5:27:17 PM PDT by JOE6PAK (My Tagline can beat the crap outta your Tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
BUSH PICKS John G. Roberts

BIOGRAPHY OF JUDGE JOHN G. ROBERTS -- a conservative for the USSC

Newsrooms & Senate Staffers Pull Data on John Roberts

Bush Nominates Federal Judge Roberts

27 posted on 07/19/2005 5:27:56 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topgun333

There is going to be so much pressure on him for this, this is going to put roe vs wade in the spotlight and the pro choice pro life camps are going to both go nuts over this.


28 posted on 07/19/2005 5:28:59 PM PDT by danny5555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

Don't you just love George Bush? After all the speculation, "consulting" and second guessing in the press, he calls out the Dems to a fist fight in the middle of the floor - without gloves!!! I love this man!!


29 posted on 07/19/2005 5:31:07 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
Damn the obstructionists. FULL SPEED AHEAD!
30 posted on 07/19/2005 5:32:02 PM PDT by Enterprise (Thus sayeth our rulers - "All your property is mine." - - - Kelo vs New London)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topgun333
settled law

I like Thomas's view on "settled law."

Why can't we get another like him?

ML/NJ

31 posted on 07/19/2005 5:32:45 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: topgun333

But the question he was asked to solicit that response was whether he agreed with the decision. He dodged the question, rather than saying he agreed that such a right existed.


32 posted on 07/19/2005 5:33:58 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (No matter what my work/play ratio is, I am never a dull boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
The only way this nominee gets to the floor for a vote is if the White House goes nuclear which will probably PO McLean and Chafee and definitely PO the RATs.
33 posted on 07/19/2005 5:35:29 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (The destination is most rewarding when you enjoy the journey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

From what I'm hearing from people I trust, I think it's time to break out the Dom Perigon bubbly.

Roberts sounds like a solid guy, the type I'd like to have as a next door neighbor.


34 posted on 07/19/2005 5:36:07 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I thought it was John C Roberts, not John G. Roberts


35 posted on 07/19/2005 5:36:08 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

What will the "scandal" be? He ate a box of Cracker Jacks once and DID NOT open the toy??!!!!!


36 posted on 07/19/2005 5:36:14 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Thanks...glad we got that cleared up.


37 posted on 07/19/2005 5:38:20 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
pic of John Roberts on Yahoo.
38 posted on 07/19/2005 5:38:53 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
This is a stunningly evenhanded article.

Either the AP's political editor took the day off, or something weird is going on.

I wonder if the lefties have decided to save the big guns for the next nomination?

39 posted on 07/19/2005 5:39:46 PM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
I am concerned from the bits I have been hearing about the cases he has tried that he is anti-abortion, but somewhat of a pro big-business lawyer.

Me, I want someone who is anti-big government, and pro tort reform. I.e. Edith Jones was just what I was looking for.

40 posted on 07/19/2005 5:40:57 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: easymoney
Roberts seems like a great pick and I expect that there will be great gnashing of teeth by the loons. What I really want to see at this press conference is a row of Senators from the Republican leadership standing behind the president and the nominee, and a press release tomorrow from Frist saying that, "Under no circumstances will a filibuster be permitted. After a fair debate, there WILL be an up or down vote."

I can dream can't I?

41 posted on 07/19/2005 5:43:12 PM PDT by Sparticus (She's so open minded that her brains leaked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
"I wonder if the lefties have decided to save the big guns for the next nomination?"

I hope that's it. Then I hope that they "save the big guns" for the third nomination. And then I hope that they decide to "save the big guns" for the fourth nomination...see where I'm headed...?

42 posted on 07/19/2005 5:44:13 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Waco
"What will the "scandal" be? He ate a box of Cracker Jacks once and DID NOT open the toy??!!!!!"

Nope. Didn't pay SS on the little kid from down the block who he hires to mow the lawn.

43 posted on 07/19/2005 5:45:28 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

abc reports that he is a practicing catholic, white man and a conservative, like it was some sort of f-king illness


44 posted on 07/19/2005 5:46:43 PM PDT by italianquaker (CONFIRM THE JUDGES BUSH=MANDATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: topgun333
"Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land."

"That contradicts his other comments about Roe v. Wade as being 'wrong.'

Great! (I hope the libs take this bait)

If the Dems can play both sides, why can't we?

45 posted on 07/19/2005 5:46:58 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Waco
He ate a box of Cracker Jacks once and DID NOT open the toy?

..bite into a "Tootsie Roll Pop", before he got to the center...or some someother liberal nonsense.

46 posted on 07/19/2005 5:47:12 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: easymoney

I knew Dubya wouldn't let us down.!!!


47 posted on 07/19/2005 5:47:41 PM PDT by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for Neo-Con America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Who leaked it??

FR leaked it some time ago on several threads.

48 posted on 07/19/2005 5:48:56 PM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: topgun333
That contradicts his other comments about Roe v. Wade as being "wrong"

No, not at all. It is unfortunately the "settled law of the land," and while he may not agree with it, it currently stands and he has no choice but to comply with it. For now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stare_decisis

Shame on Drudge for jumping up and down on that overruling quote. He's getting the pro-choicers more riled up than they need to be.
49 posted on 07/19/2005 5:50:06 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Who leaked it??

After Roberts accepted, the President called Frist, Reid, Specter and Leahy. My leak money is on Leahy.

50 posted on 07/19/2005 5:51:42 PM PDT by b4its2late (GITMO is way too nice of a place to house low life terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson