Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Questions for Sen. Schumer - (this is really FUNNY!We should send Chuckie a copy of it!)
HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE.COM ^ | JULY 19, 2005 | JAN LaRUE, ESQ.

Posted on 07/19/2005 5:21:44 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Sen. Chuck (I’m outraged again—get me a camera) Schumer (D.-N.Y.) is one busy little bee. Problem is, he’s not busy about the Senate’s business.

On a recent day, he was seen whipping up a mob to have Karl Rove, Deputy White House Chief of Staff, hanged from the Senate’s yardarm for disclosing “classified” information that was available on a Google search at the time of the alleged disclosure.

His next outrage was directed at Michael Chertoff, Director of Homeland Security. In a Senate floor diatribe, A.K.A., “speech,” Schumer told Chertoff he ought to consider resigning for having the unmitigated gall to say we need to have national security priorities in order because of limited funds.

In the midst of mugging for cameras, how in blazes did he find time to contact a fleet of liberal law professors and gather 100 questions to ask President Bush’s yet-to-be-named nominee to the Supreme Court? And by the way, let’s all send him a big thank you for exposing another one of his big, secret war plans.

Somebody’s got to de-busy this bumblebee.

I propose the following questions for Mr. Schumer to answer in writing, all by himself, before he can ever appear before another TV camera.

1. Are you aware that the First Amendment secures your right to refrain from incessant carping?

2. New York, probably more than any place on the planet, has more shrinks per square foot who treat obsessive-compulsive-media-attention-disorder. May I give you some names and numbers so that you can cease consulting with that mad doctor from Vermont?

3. Have you considered checking a thesaurus for synonyms for “extreme” and “outrageous”?

4. Do you realize that your “outrage” de jour is extremely irksome, as in, “We don’t care”?

5. And, on a serious note, if the federal law you’re accusing Rove of violating is so important to our national security, why did you vote against it when you were a member of the U.S. House of Representatives?

6. Would you refresh my recollection regarding your outrage when Democrat Sandy Berger was caught stuffing classified documents into his pants upon leaving the National Archives?

7. Would you consider introducing a bill that requires U.S. Senators to familiarize themselves with the U.S. Constitution?

8. When judges swear an oath to uphold the Constitution, shouldn’t it be in reference to the one housed at the National Archives?

9. In keeping with concerns for reducing green house gas emissions, would you contemplate taking a vow of silence?

10. Did you not know that when you speak on a cell phone in a public place, surrounded by members of the public, it’s a safe bet the public can hear you?

11. Please use your cell phone to call the White House and ask the receptionist: “Who won the last election?" Would you please enlighten your Democratic brethren and sistern with what must be a distressing and painful revelation?

12. If you have a pocket calculator, please enter 100, subtract 45 and tell us who gets to go to Disneyland?

13. If you have a copy of the actual Constitution, please read Article III, and tell us where “maintaining the balance of the Court” is located?

14. If you can’t find it, will you cease and desist from pretending it’s there and from demanding that the President maintain it?

15. Since your favorite “mainstream” justices shot down your 100 questions during their confirmation hearings, why not compress the questions into ammo for skeet shooters, rather than suffer the rest of us to endure another one of your demands?

16. Where did you get the idea that judge is synonymous with “closet legislator”?

17. Are you aware that the Supremes aren’t back-up singers for the left wing of the Senate?

18. Other than someone who thinks the Constitution is his or her personal Etch-a-Sketch, please explain what makes an acceptable “consensus” nominee?

19. Does your obsession with adhering to stare decisis include Dred Scott v. Sanford, Plessy v. Ferguson, Korematsu v. U.S. and Bowers v. Hardwick, and if not, why should a nominee pledge unqualified allegiance to the doctrine?

20. Have you considered writing a children’s book: The Incredibly Shrinking Donkey Who Kicked Its Own Behind Too Much?

Please, Sen. Schumer, chill out – for your own sake and for the sake of “promoting the general welfare.”

Ms. LaRue is chief counsel at Concerned Women for America.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; chuckie; media; newyork; questions; schumer; senatorcharles; spotlight; zaq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2005 5:21:48 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Excellent!


2 posted on 07/19/2005 5:25:14 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude; Beth528; SMARTY; CyberAnt; nothingnew; Cornpone; AmericanArchConservative; ...
I believe that Rush Limbaugh was speculating that Schumer has found himself to be the "junior senator from New York," and is simply trying to get back into his original ranking........ahead of Killery.

Char :)

3 posted on 07/19/2005 5:25:40 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"Please, Sen. Schumer, chill out – for your own sake and for the sake of “promoting the general welfare.” "

Na, let him go, I have never actually seen one explode on TV. He just might be our first, lol.
4 posted on 07/19/2005 5:27:20 PM PDT by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
That was a great and factual read. I am currently ROFLMAO! Chuckie gets the infamous Bozo award. No one even comes close to his psycho-babble. Image hosted by Photobucket.com
5 posted on 07/19/2005 5:29:05 PM PDT by tuvals (America First - Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

** Have you considered writing a children’s book: The Incredibly Shrinking Donkey Who Kicked Its Own Behind Too Much?**

LOL!


6 posted on 07/19/2005 5:30:46 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

LOL! What's funnier is that with very few modifications you could pick any number of Dems and it would still read the same.


7 posted on 07/19/2005 5:31:12 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

fyi


8 posted on 07/19/2005 5:35:40 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Good one, Char! Needs to be sent to Chuckie with a special SLERT sticker, I say!

Hard to pick just one, but this is one of my favorites...
"6. Would you refresh my recollection regarding your outrage when Democrat Sandy Berger was caught stuffing classified documents into his pants upon leaving the National Archives?"


9 posted on 07/19/2005 5:36:14 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (As long as Dean's the head of the D-N-C, it just looks better for the G-O-P!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

..Schumer has found himself to be the "junior senator from New York..
----
Schumer is still struggling with the ownership of the Dem party by the Clinton mafia. Mao-ary is going to get her way no matter what Chuckie-the-Socialist says or does.


10 posted on 07/19/2005 5:37:53 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh
"Needs to be sent to Chuckie with a special SLERT sticker, I say!"

CALLING OUT THE SLERT BRIGADE!
:)

11 posted on 07/19/2005 5:42:14 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tuvals

What?


12 posted on 07/19/2005 6:02:21 PM PDT by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; fastattacksailor; swordfish71; broadsword; Nesher; Fred Nerks; jan in Colorado; ...
Excellent Charlite, thanks for the post!

Schumer would show up for the opening of an envelope if you told him there was a camera there...I am so sick of his "outraged citizen/concerned politician" shtick it's not even funny. This really puts him in the proper perspective!

13 posted on 07/19/2005 6:03:04 PM PDT by Former Dodger ( "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." --Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I'm embarrassed to live in the same State, natch City, that these two egomaniacs claim to 'represent'. But then again, there are crazies all over the streets of this city, always were and always will be, so its not surprising that two of 'em got to be elected to the US Senate ........


14 posted on 07/19/2005 6:07:28 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

bump


15 posted on 07/19/2005 6:20:54 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
it's spelled SCHWULER!!!

16 posted on 07/19/2005 6:29:01 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

This is offensive!! It suggets that Schmuckie is a reasonable person with a sense of humor instead of a flaming chunk of porcine animal waste. His objective is to weaken and destroy America and he will do anuthing to attain that end. He is not funny; he is filth!


17 posted on 07/19/2005 6:29:16 PM PDT by Tacis ("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

What is that thing on his tie?


18 posted on 07/19/2005 6:39:30 PM PDT by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

Nevermind. (It's his bullhorn strap)


19 posted on 07/19/2005 6:40:20 PM PDT by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
8. When judges swear an oath to uphold the Constitution, shouldn’t it be in reference to the one housed at the National Archives?

snort!

20 posted on 07/19/2005 6:42:38 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson