Go back to DU, you naysayer. Mr. Bush knows what he is doing. If you want to run the country, get elected POTUS.
I have no idea what DU is, nor do I know what you mean by POTUS.
is this what got you so upset?
Wouldn't it be great if Coulter, Hannity, and Limbaugh all said that this nominee is wrong, just to defuse the liberal press and dems? Actually they are not that hard to confuse, they live in a state of confusion and fantasy anyway.
or maybe it was this?
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1108389946956
Yet those who know Roberts say he, unlike Souter, is a reliable conservative who can be counted on to undermine if not immediately overturn liberal landmarks like abortion rights and affirmative action. Indicators of his true stripes cited by friends include: clerking for Rehnquist, membership in the Federalist Society, laboring in the Ronald Reagan White House counsel's office and at the Justice Department into the Bush years, working with Kenneth Starr among others, and even his lunchtime conversations at Hogan & Hartson. "He is as conservative as you can get," one friend puts it. In short, Roberts may combine the stealth appeal of Souter with the unwavering ideology of Scalia and Thomas.
Mark Levin, author of "Men in Black," a new conservative critique of the Supreme Court, sees no conflict and is a fan of Roberts. "In the short period he has been on the court, John Roberts has shown he does not bring a personal agenda to his work. He follows the Constitution, and he is excellent."
which was it? I'm curious.
I owe you an apology. I reviewed my post to you and it was not inteded to be smug or harsh but that is the way I read it also.