Hugh Hewitt's political correct head-in-the-sandism makes him either stunningly uninformed or just plain lying.
Is Islam a peaceful religion that has been "hi-jacked by terror," or is it a religion of hi-jackers who use terror as a tool of conversion?
If we apply the handy old "80-20" rule to the 13-century history of Islam, the answer: 80% of the time, and that's a charitable estimate;
The political leaders of the West cannot deal with this because they (quite idiotically) fear an enormous populist anti-Muslim backlash that will spiral out of control and take them down with it. Hence this "hi-jacked ROP" nonsense. It would be far more sensible to restrict Muslim immigration to the West, and immediately deport those here illegally (1) and deport those who espouse radical beliefs or urge the death of "infidels."(2)
This may be achieved by some success of the very nationalistic parties in Europe, but it ain't gonna be pretty.