Nonsense. Please back up your claim.
What do you mean? The only way to back it up at this point in time is to be a test case that goes to the USSC. And a majority-strict-contructionist USSC at that.
If you think random searches are reasonable, please explain the reasoning.
Random searches catching bombers is more like a room of chimpanzees typing the complete works of Shakespeare, than real LE work. They might get a word or two right here and there, but that's about it. Likewise, random searches might catch a bomber here and there, but, with a huge emphasis on "might", that's about it.