Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

The article leaves out what Tancredo really said - that this would be his response in case of a NUCLEAR attack on several US cities. Why didn't the reporter ask Congressman Dingell what his response would be?


29 posted on 07/23/2005 6:28:11 PM PDT by DianeDePoitiers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DianeDePoitiers

Because the anti-Tancredo minions don't want to put his comments in context.


55 posted on 07/23/2005 6:43:55 PM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: DianeDePoitiers
Exactly.

What is Dingell's response to what should we do if the Islamofacists use nukes?

60 posted on 07/23/2005 6:46:50 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: DianeDePoitiers
Why didn't the reporter ask Congressman Dingell what his response would be [to a nuclear attack on the U.S. by Islamists]?

Because the (undoubtedly sympathetic) reporter knew Dingell would be hard-pressed to answer that question.

If we're hit with Islamist nukes and are unable to positively determine which nation helped the particular terrorist organization in question, I strongly suspect we would not just continue along doing what we've been doing -- attempting to bring individual terrorists to justice. Our nuclear arsenal would be used. .....and Mecca is undoutedly on the short list.

The so-called "moderate" followers of the pedophile prophet better get a handle on their cult's jihadists or they'll awaken to a nightmare.

68 posted on 07/23/2005 6:50:50 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson