Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Ports Security (Los Angeles)
Sacramento Union ^ | 7-21-05 | Jeremiah Marquez

Posted on 07/23/2005 7:14:30 PM PDT by bayourod

LOS ANGELES—The head of U.S Border Patrol on Wednesday unveiled radiation detectors to scan incoming ocean cargo for nuclear weapons and dirty bombs, a measure he says will not choke the flow of trade at the nation’s busiest port complex.

Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Robert C. Bonner said the 20-foot-high devices would substantially boost security at the Los Angeles-Long Beach harbor complex without causing major delays.

“We have to save American lives, but we also have to do it in a way ... that preserves American livelihoods,” Bonner said during a visit to the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.

The dual ports handle more than 40 percent of all cargo shipped into this country, and 80 percent of the imports from Asian manufacturing countries such as China and India.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacunion.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dhs; homelandsecurity; losangeles; port
"Nearly 540 radiation portal monitors, which cost approximately $250,000 each and are federally funded, are being used at seaports and border crossings nationwide, officials said. "

It ain't no accident that we haven't been attacked since 9/11. Thank you President Bush

1 posted on 07/23/2005 7:14:30 PM PDT by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bayourod
"It ain't no accident that we haven't been attacked since 9/11. Thank you President Bush"

Whom shall we thank for the shoddy border policy that enabled 10,000,000 illegals and countless moles and terrorist operatives to entrench themselves since 9/11?

2 posted on 07/23/2005 7:20:31 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

I heard a blurb today that the LA Port was encouraging ships to come through on 'off peak' times by charging less for processing than during 'peak times'...maybe this security story was related...of course I also heard that the Union was upset that this would create more work during the evening hours for 'less pay'...I probably heard this on FoxNews, but I have not sought out the specific weblink for the story...


3 posted on 07/23/2005 7:51:06 PM PDT by flixxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
The head of U.S Border Patrol on Wednesday unveiled radiation detectors to scan incoming ocean cargo for nuclear weapons and dirty bombs, a measure he says will not choke the flow of trade at the nation’s busiest port complex.

Lets see, we have a 600 billion dollar trade deficite with China and we are worried about slowing the flow of trade?

Perhaps we should hire a couple of senior citizens to examine every single item coming in from China--one item at a time. Being seniors, we would naturally have to give them frequent breaks. Straighten out the balance of trade real quick!

No bombs or illegals would get through either.

4 posted on 07/23/2005 8:27:42 PM PDT by onewhowatches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onewhowatches

Yes, we are. If the goods don't clear Customs quickly, businesses who use "just-in-time" inventory lose money. I was involved in a software project related to this and I learned a lot from the requirements meeting.

Customs doesn't have to check everything; its software does a good job of telling what's normal shipping and what isn't.


5 posted on 07/23/2005 8:36:37 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (Proudly confusing editors and readers since 1981!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Is it just me, or does scanning a container once it is already on American soil, in a busy, economically important port, seem a tad ineffectual?

It would seem a terrorist's best bet would be to detonate at sea, or just before unloading.

Oddly, the main deterrent here, for a terrorist, would be in the event of detonation failure. The likelihood of the failed bomb being recovered goes up dramatically if the package is scanned.
6 posted on 07/23/2005 8:39:27 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("Sometimes you're windshield, sometimes you' re the bug")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
It ain't no accident that we haven't been attacked since 9/11. Thank you President Bush

How would you possibly know this? What if plans are in effect for an attack sometime in the near future.

If the President is so security minded, why are millions entering our country illegally, completely undetected?

7 posted on 07/23/2005 8:40:06 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

The longshoreman's union is the only thing that chokes the ports to death, another monopoly situation.


8 posted on 07/23/2005 8:45:13 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955
If the goods don't clear Customs quickly, businesses who use "just-in-time" inventory lose money.

If the goods don't clear Customs quickly China goes belly up and can't afford those nukes they are planning for US! Businesses can buy American.

9 posted on 07/23/2005 8:54:34 PM PDT by onewhowatches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flixxx

There is a huge new facility being built in Houston to unload ships from several Asian companies that have been using California ports. The waiting time in California is cause by not enough union workers according to our press.


10 posted on 07/24/2005 6:12:54 AM PDT by bayourod (Cowards taunt terrorists from anonymous keyboards while soldiers in Iraq face the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Black Tooth
"If the President is so security minded, why are millions entering our country illegally, completely undetected? "

Because Tancred & Co. are blocking the legislation the Sec of Homeland Defense testified are necessary to securing our border. Tancredo would rather have the issue for his fund raising than secure the border.

Whose side are you on, the man in charge of defending us or the professional fundraiser?

11 posted on 07/24/2005 7:24:44 AM PDT by bayourod (Cowards taunt terrorists from anonymous keyboards while soldiers in Iraq face the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson