Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
OYEZ DOT ORG ^ | 7-2005

Posted on 07/24/2005 7:51:56 AM PDT by doug from upland

THE OYEZ PROJECT: U.S. SUPREME COURT MULTIMEDIA
Advanced
On This Day Justices Cases Tour Discussions Yahoo Appellate.Net On The Docket


Restoring the Lost Constitution



U.S. Supreme Court Justices

A listing of all Supreme Court justices.



Stephen G. Breyer  

(Associate: August 3, 1994)

Ruth Bader Ginsburg  

(Associate: August 10, 1993)

Clarence Thomas  

(Associate: October 23, 1991)

David H. Souter  

(Associate: October 9, 1990)

Anthony Kennedy  

(Associate: February 18, 1988)

William H. Rehnquist  

(Associate: January 7, 1972 and Chief: September 26, 1986)

Antonin Scalia  

(Associate: September 26, 1986)

Sandra Day O'Connor  

(Associate: September 25, 1981)

John Paul Stevens  

(Associate: December 19, 1975)

Lewis F. Powell, Jr.  

(Associate: January 7, 1972)

Harry A. Blackmun  

(Associate: June 9, 1970)

Warren E. Burger  

(Chief: June 23, 1969)

Thurgood Marshall  

(Associate: October 2, 1967)

Abe Fortas  

(Associate: October 4, 1965)

Arthur J. Goldberg  

(Associate: October 1, 1962)

Byron R. White  

(Associate: April 16, 1962)

Potter Stewart  

(Associate: October 14, 1958)

Charles E. Whittaker  

(Associate: March 25, 1957)

William J. Brennan, Jr.  

(Associate: October 16, 1956)

John M. Harlan  

(Associate: March 28, 1955)

Earl Warren  

(Chief: October 5, 1953)

Sherman Minton  

(Associate: October 12, 1949)

Tom C. Clark  

(Associate: August 24, 1949)

Fred M. Vinson  

(Chief: June 24, 1946)

Harold Burton  

(Associate: October 1, 1945)

Wiley B. Rutledge  

(Associate: February 15, 1943)

Robert H. Jackson  

(Associate: July 11, 1941)

James F. Byrnes  

(Associate: July 8, 1941)

Harlan Fiske Stone  

(Associate: March 2, 1925 and Chief: July 3, 1941)

Frank Murphy  

(Associate: February 5, 1940)

William O. Douglas  

(Associate: April 17, 1939)

Felix Frankfurter  

(Associate: January 30, 1939)

Stanley Reed  

(Associate: January 31, 1938)

Hugo L. Black  

(Associate: August 19, 1937)

Benjamin N. Cardozo  

(Associate: March 14, 1932)

Owen J. Roberts  

(Associate: June 2, 1930)

Charles E. Hughes  

(Associate: October 10, 1910 and Chief: February 24, 1930)

Edward T. Sanford  

(Associate: February 19, 1923)

Pierce Butler  

(Associate: January 2, 1923)

George Sutherland  

(Associate: October 2, 1922)

William Howard Taft  

(Chief: July 11, 1921)

John H. Clarke  

(Associate: October 9, 1916)

Louis D. Brandeis  

(Associate: June 5, 1916)

James C. McReynolds  

(Associate: October 12, 1914)

Mahlon Pitney  

(Associate: March 18, 1912)

Willis Van Devanter  

(Associate: January 3, 1911)

Joseph R. Lamar  

(Associate: January 3, 1911)

Edward D. White  

(Associate: March 12, 1894 and Chief: December 19, 1910)

Horace H. Lurton  

(Associate: January 3, 1910)

William H. Moody  

(Associate: December 17, 1906)

William R. Day  

(Associate: March 2, 1903)

Oliver W. Holmes, Jr.  

(Associate: December 8, 1902)

Joseph McKenna  

(Associate: January 26, 1898)

Rufus Peckham  

(Associate: January 6, 1896)

Howell E. Jackson  

(Associate: March 4, 1893)

George Shiras, Jr.  

(Associate: October 10, 1892)

Henry B. Brown  

(Associate: January 5, 1891)

David J. Brewer  

(Associate: January 6, 1890)

Melville W. Fuller  

(Chief: October 8, 1888)

Lucius Q.C. Lamar  

(Associate: January 18, 1888)

Samuel Blatchford  

(Associate: April 3, 1882)

Horace Gray  

(Associate: January 9, 1882)

Stanley Matthews  

(Associate: May 17, 1881)

William B. Woods  

(Associate: January 5, 1881)

John M. Harlan  

(Associate: December 10, 1877)

Morrison R. Waite  

(Chief: March 4, 1874)

Ward Hunt  

(Associate: January 9, 1873)

Joseph P. Bradley  

(Associate: March 23, 1870)

William Strong  

(Associate: March 14, 1870)

Salmon P. Chase  

(Chief: December 15, 1864)

Stephen J. Field  

(Associate: May 20, 1863)

David Davis  

(Associate: December 10, 1862)

Samuel F. Miller  

(Associate: July 21, 1862)

Noah Swayne  

(Associate: January 27, 1862)

Nathan Clifford  

(Associate: January 21, 1858)

John A. Campbell  

(Associate: April 11, 1853)

Benjamin R. Curtis  

(Associate: October 10, 1851)

Robert C. Grier  

(Associate: August 10, 1846)

Levi Woodbury  

(Associate: September 23, 1845)

Samuel Nelson  

(Associate: February 27, 1845)

Peter V. Daniel  

(Associate: January 10, 1842)

John McKinley  

(Associate: January 9, 1838)

John Catron  

(Associate: May 1, 1837)

Philip P. Barbour  

(Associate: May 12, 1836)

Roger B. Taney  

(Chief: March 28, 1836)

James M. Wayne  

(Associate: January 14, 1835)

Henry Baldwin  

(Associate: January 18, 1830)

John McLean  

(Associate: January 11, 1830)

Robert Trimble  

(Associate: June 16, 1826)

Smith Thompson  

(Associate: September 1, 1823)

Joseph Story  

(Associate: February 3, 1812)

Gabriel Duvall  

(Associate: November 23, 1811)

Thomas Todd  

(Associate: May 4, 1807)

Brockholst Livingston  

(Associate: January 20, 1807)

William Johnson  

(Associate: May 7, 1804)

John Marshall  

(Chief: February 4, 1801)

Alfred Moore  

(Associate: April 21, 1800)

Bushrod Washington  

(Associate: February 4, 1799)

Oliver Ellsworth  

(Chief: March 8, 1796)

Samuel Chase  

(Associate: February 4, 1796)

William Paterson  

(Associate: March 11, 1793)

Thomas Johnson  

(Associate: August 6, 1792)

James Iredell  

(Associate: May 12, 1790)

John Rutledge  

(Associate: February 15, 1790 and Chief: August 12, 1795)

William Cushing  

(Associate: February 2, 1790)

John Blair  

(Associate: February 2, 1790)

John Jay  

(Chief: October 19, 1789)

James Wilson  

(Associate: October 5, 1789)
All justices, Sorted:
Alphabetically | Chronologically

http://www.oyez.org/oyez/portlet/justices/

Copyright 1996-2005 by Jerry Goldman | Citations and Links | About Oyez | Help | Privacy and Copyright Statement | Contribute



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: scotus; supremecourt

1 posted on 07/24/2005 7:51:56 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thanks Doug! What a great link for future research.


2 posted on 07/24/2005 7:55:31 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thanks for this post! I wouldn't even have known where to begin to look for this information.


3 posted on 07/24/2005 7:58:57 AM PDT by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The end of this list, early years chronologically, offer one more proof that reality is not the way the civics books and other dumbed-down sources like newspapers, are wrong in their casual accounts of history. Note that Chief Justice Marshall was not the "first" Chief Justice in American history.

He was the first one to make serious news (in later centuries). But he was the fourth one to be appointed. See for yourselves.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Re: John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee"

4 posted on 07/24/2005 8:00:01 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
HERE ARE THE BIOS OF THE CURRENT JUSTICES
5 posted on 07/24/2005 8:12:59 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Execellent. Thanks Doug.


6 posted on 07/24/2005 8:16:38 AM PDT by toomanygrasshoppers (Freud was wrong. It's all about "Roe v. Wade")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Can you give us your list, including O'Connor, of most conservative to most liberal?


7 posted on 07/24/2005 8:18:52 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Follow the links, read the bio, and then click on "Baseball".

Pretty cool ... its poses a multiple-choice question as to what baseball player is/way most like the selected Justice. I tried a few, from the earliest Justices), and looks like someone put some thought into matching a Justice's life and some baseball player in history

8 posted on 07/24/2005 8:49:03 AM PDT by C210N (-Today is a gift, that's why it is called the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

That is cool.


9 posted on 07/24/2005 8:53:20 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I have read that the mediocre Anthony Kennedy was hoping to become Chief Justice. He obviously won't get it. So, maybe when that post is filled after Rehnquest's retirement, Kennedy himself will retire. Than a more conservative Justice will replace him.


10 posted on 07/24/2005 9:25:41 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Mike DeWine for retirement, John Kasich for Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I prefer to use the term "respecting the Constitution" rather than "conservative," because on the Court respect for the Constitution is the real issue. At the other end of the scale are the "never mind the Constitution" Justices, who will decide each case based on how they think in their gut they should vote, regardless of what the Constitution says.

So, I shorten the labels to "Respect" and "Disrespect" for the Constitution, and here is my admittedly non-mathematical list. In each case, the first number is "Respect" and the second is "Disrespect."

And keep in mind that the numbers are skewed, especially in the case of Chief Justice Rehnquist, because he puts the greatest store on stare decisis, meaning following the precedents of the Court itself. In the last vote which would have reconsidered Roe v. Wade, the Chief Justice made it clear that were he "acting on a clean slate," he would have voted against that doctrine. But because a long line of precedents say otherwise, he voted to sustain it.

Justice Ginsburg -- 0% -- 100%

Justice Stevens -- 0% -- 100%

Justice Souter -- 5% -- 95%

Justice Kennedy -- 20% -- 80%

Justice O'Connor -- 50% -- 50% (O'Connor truly is a "swing vote," though that is bad, not good, for a Justice. The same result could have been obtained in the last ten years of her career by flipping a giant coin, as by having her allegedly decide cases on the law, and write allegedly reasoned decisions justifying her votes.)

Chief Justice Rehnquist -- 70% -- 30%

Justice Scalia -- 95% -- 5%

Justice Thomas -- 100% -- 0%

Estimate for Justice Roberts -- 90% -- 10%

This is not based on any mathematical computations. It is based on reading all the decisions of the Court for the past quarter century, and reading a few hundred pages of technical writings by and about him in his legal career.

Interesting question you raised. I hope this is useful to you and others.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Re: John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee"

11 posted on 07/24/2005 10:04:09 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Great. Thanks for sharing your insights.


12 posted on 07/24/2005 10:18:17 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Good find, Doug. I'd be curious to know who wrote the biographies of the justices. A few samplings:

On Ginsburg: While leaning towards the liberal side of the Court's political spectrum, Ginsburg has not hesitated to vote with her conservative colleagues.

On Thomas: Since becoming a justice, Thomas has aligned closely with the far right of the Court. He votes most frequently on the same side as the conservative camp of Rehnquist and Scalia. When Thomas began his tenure on the Court, many observers perceived him as a junior version of Scalia. Since then, Thomas has emerged from Scalia's shadow offering hints at his own conservative thinking.

On Souter: Together with O'Connor and Kennedy, Souter has formed a moderate bloc in the Court that prevents domination from the conservative wing.

On Stevens: He has demonstrated considerable judicial restraint and deference to the Congress. Stevens…remains something of a wildcard in the political balance of the Court.

On Rehnquist: After Chief Justice Burger retired from the Court, President Reagan nominated Rehnquist to replace him. Liberals howled in protest. Many painted Rehnquist as a racist and conservative extremist. Opponents alleged racist behavior (an old charge) when Rehnquist was a Republican official in Phoenix. Others charged that he had mishandled a family trust. In the end, however, these accusations remained unproved and the Senate confirmed Rehnquist by a solid majority.

And most interestingly, on Scalia: As Scalia's role changes from a spearhead to an anchor in the moderating Court, the ever-unpredictable justice continues to amuse, astonish, satisfy, and frighten many Court watchers….Many believe that the moderation of the Court in recent years through the nominations of President Clinton will increasingly paint Scalia into an extreme intellectual corner. His confrontational and argumentative style may also detach him further from the mainstream of the Court. However, regardless of his future role and position on the ever-changing Court, Scalia's legal genius and rhetorical powers will likely ensure that his voice and vision, if not always supported, will continue to be heard.

Still, a very interesting read.

13 posted on 07/24/2005 10:35:00 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Skol Vikings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Congressman Billybob said: "Estimate for Justice Roberts -- 90% -- 10%"

That's very encouraging. Are there any indications whatever as to what his "opinions" are relating to the right to keep and bear arms?

14 posted on 07/24/2005 11:07:53 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
I've read nothing from Judge Roberts directly related to the 2nd Amendment. However, a long profile in the Washington Post (of all places) today, quotes a lawyer who worked closely with Roberts for almost 20 years. That gentleman, a self-declared liberal, concluded that Roberts was conservative, even though he seldom talked about politics.

This quote jumped off the page. The man said he thought Roberts was a legal conservative because he always took the approach that "words have consequences." He always read the basic documents and worked up from there. And THAT is exactly the approach of Scalia and Thomas.

Apply that thinking to the 2nd Amendment as it was originally written, and the answer is, as the Emerson case said, that the right to bear arms is "a personal right." That's an indirect, not a direct answer. But on this subject, that's the best there is.

John / Billybob

15 posted on 07/24/2005 12:10:22 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; doug from upland; All
In my post rating all Justices on their respect, or not, for the Constitution, I entirely forgot about Justice Breyer. I know, I know, that's very easy to do. (Eight bars of the song, "Mr. Cellophane" from the movie Chicago.)

I did proofread. There are nine Justices. I had nine ratings. But I'd included an estimate for Justice Roberts and left Justice Breyer out. LOL.

So: Justice Breyer -- 5% -- 85%

And in retrospect, I'll change Souter to 10% -- 90%. (Still terrible, but not as terrible.)

John / Billybob

16 posted on 07/24/2005 12:36:10 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Yes, I know. Knowing you, I should have realized calling it respect for the Constitution, not conservative, is the correct way to frame it.


17 posted on 07/24/2005 12:49:44 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson