Posted on 07/25/2005 6:54:12 PM PDT by Gumlegs
Repeal Marbury v. Madison!
I started working on my sarcastic, (though relevant) letter to the two Dim retard Senators in my state on the belief that you had a good idea, then changed my mind. All they're going to do is count the number of replies from the leftie link and proclaim an overwhelming oppposition to Roberts. Sorry, I don't want my IP addy numbered amongst the baby killers.
My letter:
I am a registered voter in Minnesota who supports John Roberts for the U.S. Supreme Court. If Roberts is confirmed to a lifetime appointment, there is little doubt that he will be reasonable and fair. As Deputy Solicitor General under the first President Bush, he argued to the Supreme Court that "Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled...."
Appointment to the Supreme Court allows unparalleled power and opportunity to shape national law and policy for generations. A reasonable judge, if elevated to the Supreme Court, could tip the balance in many cases. Roberts, who has demonstrated reasonableness about many choices we make, will very likely be such a judge. The American public deserves a nominee that can be counted on to uphold constitutional rights. John Roberts is the one who will support legitimate rights, not made up ones by jurists mascarading as legislators.
But... but... but... I've been assured that Roberts is Souter in disguise! Why is NARAL upset? :)
roflol!
The real question is Peanut or Plain M&Ms.
I can't vote for him until I know!
"...if that's what it takes to get elected, they'll forgive her."
I agree. Increasingly the Democratic Party is under the control of the Hard Left. Deception is their stock in trade.
Giggle, that was fun!
The whole country will change if Hillary ever gets control AGAIN! If anyone thought eight years of Clinton was bad, they haven't seen anything if Hillary ever gets elected! She is a pathological liar and will do anything to get her way. I'm mean anything!
Fruit.
You have to be careful because those form systems actually censor out coments which can be used to create volume.
IOW you may THINK you are being "cute" when in fact you are lending your name to the oposition.
"Why do we think that Roberts will vote pro-life? He said in 2003 for his appellate confirmation that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and that he would support it."
To an appellete judge, Supreme Court decisions, are the law of the land. To Supreme Court judge, they are not.
o'h
I am beginning to support the theory, call me a radical, that if an M&M doesn't have peanuts, it's not an M&M.
It's just chocolate candy. Think about it.
Not the name and E-mail address that I left!
Dolly P. Babykiller at hystericalwomyn.com. It went through, too.
We wouldn't want innocent babies in mommy's womb to be saved now, would we? All babies should be killed in the womb. Then we would lower our population. That's it. Let's kill 'em all in the womb. Let's not stop there. If the child is inconvenient, a mommy has the right to get rid of it until kindergarten time. That's a 5-year test drive. By then, mom and dad should know whether the kid deserves to live.
She is not abandoning them. Do not believe that for a second. She will lie to your face and tell you anything to get elected and do what she damn well pleases when she is elected. Then no one will hold her accountable because they are all afraid of her!
Hillary is hoping that we all forget who she is and what she did during the Clinton administration. Write yourself a note and never forget; Hillary Clinton is a POWER HUNGRY, left wing kook liberal!
Bill was a pretty good spoiler during her first administration but if she's elected again all He**s gonna break loose count on it.
You are so argumentative.
It still says M&M on the little swollen chocolate candy.
How many repetitions can you find in the above statement? (Hint: it is not four)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.