Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: myheroesareDeadandRegistered; Prime Choice; Moonman62; RightWhale

Burt Rutan was able to use the data from the billions of dollars spend by the NACA, NASA, USAF, and private contractors over more than 50 years to achieve what he did. I am certainly not dissing Rutan. NASA cheered him on like everyone else did. However a suborbital up and down is not the same as achieving orbit with a payload capability that the Shuttle has.

myheroesareDeadandRegistered - "and no heat tiles for the return."

The Delta-V required for orbit is quite different for a suborbital up and down. Rutan's ship was not designed to withstand an atmospheric entry from orbit.


25 posted on 07/26/2005 1:05:04 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
However a suborbital up and down is not the same as achieving orbit with a payload capability that the Shuttle has.

No it's not, but I don't recall anyone downplaying Alan Shepard's suborbital flight.

26 posted on 07/26/2005 5:03:37 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson