I can't understand what anyone could mock her for.
Posted on 07/27/2005 4:24:28 AM PDT by rhema
That's a criticism? >>>>veg<<<<
"Eliminate, eradicate, and stamp out redundancy!"
Yeah, yeah, everybody's all fired up about redundancy, but where's the outrage over polysyllabificationizing?
Does this mean we have to be nice to Old Crusty?
"How many of US have slammed Hillary Clinton for the extra helping of butt she has?"
Butt? I can't get past those demonic eyes.
I can't understand what anyone could mock her for.
And always remember to eschew verbose articulation.
I completely agree! Home schooling integrated with the internet is the future. Kids learning at their own speed without idiotic teachers holding them back. I suggest there is going to be a revolution shortly in this matter of education.
"And always remember to eschew verbose articulation."
Aha! Caught you red-handed in a blatant act of sesquipedalianism.
bttt
Yes, but sometimes I think they try to tempt us ... like releasing a flock of wild turkeys over a skeet shooting range. There's no way Waxman isn't an intentional plant. And what about Reno? Pelosi? So many Turkeys ... so little time.
I'd like to see some pics of the people who write these things. Bet they are not supermodels!
I was the one who was though most likely to end up in prison for the rest of my life. The true Charlie Brown of my school.
No secret that Liberals are immature, shallow, selfish children that never grew up.
Yes, but "WE" are not the MSM or represent the GOP.
The media and RAT politicians never mock the appearance of Thomas, Hillary, Kennedy, etal. as they commonly do with Republicans and conservatives, while the GOP never childishly reciprocates.
THey mock her for being pretty. They mock her for being feminine and heterosexual. They mock her for having a beautiful figure. They mock her for being that most charming and gracious of all creatures, a Southern lady. They despise the very concept of being pretty and pleasant to men, and the classic idea of being a "lady"--noble, strong, courageous, honorable, and sweet--is horrifying to them. They mock her because she stands for something they are doing their best to destroy, traditional Judeo-Christian values. So they make fun of the fact that she uses makeup to enhance her appearance and feel superior, from the pit of their craven hatreds.
The difference is that we are criticizing Albright and Thomas and Hillary between ourselves. We are not writing articles for the consumption of the masses in major newspapers or on broadcast television. People tend to say a lot of things in a just-friends atmosphere that they would not say before 300 million fellow citizens. If we can't speak frankly before our friends, where else can we voice our opinions?
That said, a gentleman does not comment negatively or in a sexual manner on the appearance of a woman, unless he's going to do so in the most oblique, subtle, Christopher Hitchens type of way. Which is really far more satisfying and clever than doing it straight out!
Single gals like that, don't stay single long.
And men married to women like that, need to let other men know that they own loaded guns.
Yeah - but can I do it until I need glasses?
There ought to be more like her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.