No wonder somebody once said, something akin to, "The U.S. is likely to be the only country in world history to adopt policies and laws that ensure self-destruction."
Relating to terrorists, is it any wonder a seized al-Qaida training manual pointed out, "why attack a lion, when you can attack a lamb?"
We lived up to this: they tested us and with few exceptions, we invited attacks: our embassy hostages in Iran - no retaliation; Beirut - no retaliation; Khobar Towers - no retaliation, two U.S. embassies - no retaliation; USS COLE - no retaliation; and WTC '93 - no retaliation because Clinton kissed it off as a 'law enforcement matter.' Also, after each attack on his watch, his empty response was the same: we would not tolerate these attacks. All to avoid retaliation.
Then, in the runup to the 2000 elections, the Rats mantra was Bush is a wimp. I feel terrorists mis-calculated it would be more of the same and thus 9/11. This time the lamb turned out to be a tiger.
Is it time for a game of Cowboys and Muslims with 'tit-for-tat'?
Cowboys and Muslims!
Brilliant! LOL!
You mean like Israel? Sorry. I'd rather blow both their 'tats' off to begin with. Round 'em up, ship 'em out, Rawhide.