Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: macamadamia
Why not simply.....destroy the enemy?

Unfortunately, Islam is the enemy. Mecca is its home. You figure out the rest.

As I mentioned before, I don't want this to happen. I'm more hoping that the threat that it could happen will give pause to terrorists.
139 posted on 07/28/2005 12:29:12 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: JamesP81

"Islam is the enemy. Mecca is its home."
"I'm more hoping that the threat that it could happen will give pause to terrorists."



Mecca isn't home in a military sense. If we are nuked, "hoping" and "giving pause" are poor strategies. You take out your enemy and your enemy's weapons; you don't strike at them simply hoping they'll submit or change their minds...you strike them emphatically to keep them from ever striking you again. You strike them to keep yourself alive. While one of our cities is smoking and radioactive it would be IMHO immoral simply to nuke Mecca because it guarantees nothing and keeps us at terrible risk. Terrorists are empowered by the states that sponsor them, that arm them...this is where we strike. What is Islam militarily if no nation wants anything to do with Islamic terrorists? States who sponsor terrorists should know that if we are hit with a nuke, they in turn will ALL be hit with nukes regardless of where culpability lies....MAD. I really doubt Syria, for example, will stop its sponsorship of terrorism because Mecca is no more.


156 posted on 07/28/2005 1:24:04 PM PDT by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson