Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: k2blader
If one supports denying food and water...

It should be made clear here that the actual action in question, rather than the overly broad judgment, was seeking a ruling on if intravenous application of nutrition and fluids was a medical treatment or ordinary care. The government hospital was not trying to deny meals to patients where the patient feeds him or herself.

I'm sure that this is already understood, but some others reading this might not understand.
29 posted on 07/28/2005 6:30:43 PM PDT by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: kingu
The government hospital was not trying to deny meals to patients where the patient feeds him or herself.

Respectfully, I think this is where we may disagree. I think whether or not a patient is able to feed himself is irrelevant. Little babies can't feed themselves, but we would never think of not helping them with that.

32 posted on 07/28/2005 6:50:59 PM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson