To: k2blader
If one supports denying food and water...
It should be made clear here that the actual action in question, rather than the overly broad judgment, was seeking a ruling on if intravenous application of nutrition and fluids was a medical treatment or ordinary care. The government hospital was not trying to deny meals to patients where the patient feeds him or herself.
I'm sure that this is already understood, but some others reading this might not understand.
29 posted on
07/28/2005 6:30:43 PM PDT by
kingu
(Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
To: kingu
The government hospital was not trying to deny meals to patients where the patient feeds him or herself. Respectfully, I think this is where we may disagree. I think whether or not a patient is able to feed himself is irrelevant. Little babies can't feed themselves, but we would never think of not helping them with that.
32 posted on
07/28/2005 6:50:59 PM PDT by
k2blader
(Hic sunt dracones..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson