[camle]

isn't it illegal for a judge to predetermine a case before he gets the facts?

if so, aren't these hags contributing to the commission of a crime by threatening to not confirm ROberts until he viotates the law?

[been_lurking]

Our elected officials demanding that a judicial nominee guarantee bias and prejudice before hearing the facts on a matter before the justices. Their demand is backed by a threat to the future justice's position.

Seems to me that this is a classic case of judicial tampering with conspiracy and racketeering -- all from elected officials.

Our system is broke.

[topher]

if so, aren't these hags contributing to the commission of a crime by threatening to not confirm ROberts until he viotates the law?

Sounds like the DC Chapter of Freerepublic needs to make citizen arrests in the name of the Constitution.