To: MirrorField
A fellow nitpicker! Thank you. :o)
Hmm. How about "uteropreneur"?
30 posted on
07/31/2005 9:43:26 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(As always, striving for accuracy.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Maybe. I do note that "gestational carrier" is wikipedia definition for such person and that the article notes that surrogacy is "not yet well defined". It is quite possible that this technology is so new that generally-agreed terminology for various participants and other parts do not yet exist... Which could give ...propagandally inclined... people opportunity to frame the debate on their own terms.
ObMyOpinion: Parents are what counts. Biological parentage is of far, far less importance. And if kids' guardian(s) are responsible and up to the task, I would approve parenting by AI, uplifted dolphins, space aliens or even gay couples. Unless positively proven incapable or unsuitable for the job of course, for example by being connected to kiddie molesting or such, but that's a job for CPS.
31 posted on
08/01/2005 12:20:45 PM PDT by
MirrorField
(Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson