To: NormsRevenge
Yes, that is all we need in California, an easier way to voter fraud and cheating -- the libs would love it.
2 posted on
07/29/2005 1:50:00 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: NormsRevenge
SACRAMENTO (AP) - California election officials have rejected an electronic voting machine by Diebold after tests revealed unacceptable levels of screen freezes and paper jams. Screen freezes and paper jams, bad; total lack of security and virtually open access to the database, no problemo.
Gotcha Brucie, yer doin a great job out there.
5 posted on
07/29/2005 2:13:38 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: NormsRevenge
I find it funny that a state that can keep track of six different lotteries can't vote using the same process.
To: NormsRevenge
The Democrats demanded an expensive fix to a non-existent problem. And now they discover the fix is less secure than the paper ballot it replaced. All because they couldn't stand being called losers. Life's funny when you learn a lesson the hard way - if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
12 posted on
07/29/2005 5:57:46 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson