Check out Americans for Rice
Posted on 07/31/2005 2:29:15 PM PDT by wagglebee
Could it be we now have two horses pulling in the same direction?
I got no complaints.
Sec Def Rumseld is probably glad to have the help. Damn Sure "Gen" Powell didn't do anything to help!
I suspect you are correct. Secretary Rumsfeld, seems to me, learns from reality as well as any. For a high horsepower fighter pilot egotist this is exceptional. He is not afraid to see that he has been wrong. This is Courage.
Secretary Rice is an absolute gem. Been saying so for years. Check my back posts.
Maybe she will be a presidential contender in the near future?
Rumsfeld didn't finish the war 'with the army he has'. The 'struggle' has moved to the diplomatic front. Bush wants Rice to take the lead.
Rummy did a great job. He defeated Saddam's Army and drove him from power. The war has been over for two years. This is just mopping up, ane everybody knew it would take a while. We have enough of the MSM trying to spin Iraq as a quagmire without any help from FReepers.
Check out Americans for Rice
Sorry. The war isn't over until the enemy stops fighting and our troops are not being killed.
I agree with your assessment of Sec Rumsfeld. When he became Sec of Def, he butted heads with the Army generals because they did not transform their service in line with the DoD plans. This tense relationship hurted the initial phases of the ground war in Iraq, The Army wanted more troops and spares before attacking Iraq. Rumsfeld felt that the generals were too cautious and ignoring the miracles of computer management and communications technology which does not require many troops to fight battles nor long logistics trains. He was partially correct, but his technique of handling opposition was very corporate. He kept firing the generals who supported more troops until he got one that said yes. (This is typical in corporate America, if the CEO wants to structure a deal and if the lawyer or accountant said it was illegal or not possible, hardheaded CEO's kept firing them until he got one that said yes). The battle for Iraq certified Rumsfeld faith in technology over caution and large numbers, but the occupation of Iraq proved that the generals' propensity to have more men and spares just in case things don't go right was equally valid. I think the professional soldiers and Rumsfeld learned from each other. I will criticize Rumsfeld initial corporate viewpoint of war and technology, but I will admire him for learning very quickly, and striking the right balance between pushing GWB's needs and listening to his generals a bit more. Unlike the Democrat critics, I do not think he should resign. Rumsfeld has learned and from it he is the most experienced Secretary of Defense we ever had.
Damn Sure "Gen" Powell didn't do anything to help!
---
Except leak to the Washington Post...
The war didn't start two years ago and it's not over yet. The war has been going on since Saddam invaded Kuwait. It has been low intensity at times but it has never gone away. Pilots have been flying combat missions over Iraqi soil for over a decade. And at any rate, Iraq is just one theatre in the War on Terror. The Iraq war itself is not over, nor is the larger one. This is not spin- simply reality.
More good news on Condi!
How is she doing cleaning out the State Department? I don't think I've seen anything on that in a while.
Well said, but I can't criticize him on his viewpoints regarding his assessments of the war forced upon us nor his desire to create a leaner meaner fighting machine (military).
Doubt she did anything at all to diss Rumsfeld.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.