"Bush took no effective action against this criminal conspiracy. Why not? My guess is that this administration is dirty as well."
Your guess would be wrong.
After 8 years of nothing but Clinton .. the last thing Bush should have done was keep Clinton on the TV screen for another few years.
And .. what people don't realize was that there were thousands of Clinton people within the admin who were covering up and hiding stuff. Even those charges that were brought were met with judges who threw everything out of court. Why beat your head against a wall - accomplish nothing .. and then have the other party constantly whine about your attack against Clinton.
Clinton's personal approval rating was 25% when he left office. A person would be crazy to keep his stinking face on the TV.
Bush has .. in effect .. totally destroyed the entire democrat party. Taking them all out is better than focusing on Clinton. And .. with the advent of the restructuring in the CIA, the State Dept and the FBI - a lot of the Clinton cronies have been relieved of duty - or asked to resign.
Besides, Bush had his own agenda and a mess to clean up from the Clinton reign. Why give the Clintons any more face time.
But .. if you insist on saying the Bush admin is dirty .. you'll have to submit solid proof - and there isn't any.
You are correct that he has done the transcendently more effective thing: he has destroyed the Democrat Party.
Where's your proof?
Many of us wanted justice to be served by the arch-criminal Clinton being jailed. I took the betrayal by the new administration as continuing DC business as usual - another lying, thieving, self-interested politician in charge. He would countenance anything as long as he and his supporters got to pilfer a significant share of the loot.