Many of your fellow RINO's feel exactly the same way.
The federal budget has gone from an $80 billion surplus in 2000 to a $567 billion dollar deficit in 2004.
Actually according to the OMB the FY2004 deficit was $412 billion, but don't let the facts get in the way.
2005 is still looking to turn in a $500 billion deficit.
Wrong again. The original projection for 2005 was at $426 billion, and due to better than expected revenues the White House now projects this year's deficit to be $333 billion. Morgan Stanley project $335 billion. You're off again by over $150 billion.
If you eliminated all nondefense, non homeland security discretionary spending, you'd still have a $150 billion deficit for 2004.
Once again, your numbers are inaccurate. Discretionary spending for FY2004 is due to be $908 billion. All defense and Homeland Security spending comes out to $499 billion. That leaves $409 billion in discretionary spending. Take that out of the budget, and using Morgan Stanley's $335 billion deficit, that would leave you with a surplus of $74 billion, not a deficit of $150 billion.
Any more liberal arguments I can shoot down? If you're going to come to Free Republican and argue for tax increases, at least have the courtesy of basing your argument on the actual numbers.