You must understand that part of my frame of reference is reading his past posts that purport that the white founding fathers of this country meant for this country to be for their descendants and only their descendants. It might alleviate things if he occasionally took the time and consideration to actually answer the challenges and questions we've posed of him rather than leaving people like you to do so and running off back into the Natalee Holloway thread which he only entered, for what it's worth, a few weeks ago to try and assert that it was the 2 black guards and not "the Dutch boy" who could've done it. He's changed his tune on that.......I think.
I frankly don't think that he shares the same subtleties and distinctions that you've read into his posts and tried to communicate to me (not that I fully agree with yours either, but at least they are not as one dimensional as his) i.e., I don't think the two of you are on the same page.
I'm sympathetic to your frame of reference, but I guess I didn't see those posts when rdb3 sent me on assignment. I read through all on the page he linked me to and didn't see any with the tone you've noted.
I really can't speak for him and am not trying to. I'm only giving you the impression I had when I first read his post. I was surprised of the immediacy and violence of the attacks and pingers launched at him for comments not unlike many others on this thread. I'm not in a habit of reading the history of posters in threads I read. I pretty much read them as I see them. That is unless I've already formed an opinion from previous threads.
Thanks again for your thoughts.