I'm not saying this particular man's release was based on a technicality.
But, yes, DNA could be a technicality. Please reread my first post where I gave an example of it as a technicality in a local case.
however, sometimes I think we go overboard with this DNA .....
what convicted people before DNA?
I question why one singular test can "Free" a client while all other evidence is ignored....
why was this guy arrested and singled out in the first place?...
sure, that "R" business is grounds for eliminating that line-up, but still, there was the victims claims as well as the other witness.....
hope justice was truely served here...because frankly, I just don't know anymore....
for one, I have no trust in the "innocence" project because of its association with that Simpson lawyer, the same one who freed that evil little nanny from England after killing that two year old....remember that case?.....
you see, I think there are lawyers who don't think ANYBODY is guilty of ANYTHING....