[Atlas Sneezed]

I don't see how this law violates private property rights. If the church doesn't want guns on their property, all they have to do is either post a sign or verbally notify the congregants.

---

I forgot about that.

You are indeed right, because the state has an interst in not having confrotations and conflicts (invloving gun carriers, especially) that could be avoided by a sign.

[George from New England]

Could it be that these "chuches" - sic - want it both ways.

They want to ban guns but at the same time they want no visible signs or notices to that effect?

That would make them "feel" safe knowing that the criminals might not know, but at the same time disarming the congregation.

Some criminals still rob banks even knowing they'll encounter gunning resistance. If the congregation is disarmed the effect can still be just as deadly.