Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Central American Leaders Praise Passage of CAFTA
Truth about Trade & Technology, IA ^ | August 2, 2005 | Chris Kraul

Posted on 08/02/2005 2:18:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Mexico City — Central American government and business leaders on Thursday hailed U.S. congressional passage of a regional free trade agreement as a boon to their consumers and modernization efforts.

But the region's labor unions and some agricultural interests warned of job losses and other dire effects.

The Central American Free Trade Agreement won't have much effect on the U.S. economy because U.S. trade with the region is relatively small. But boosters say the trade pact may give a much-needed lift to one of the poorest regions of the hemisphere if it delivers benefits as promised.

"We woke up today with the certainty of a free trade agreement that has been a closely held dream for many years," said President Tony Saca of El Salvador, a strong proponent. "Central America has won, and we should all celebrate."

Honduran President Ricardo Maduro said CAFTA would produce "economic growth and dignified, permanent jobs."

The pact passed the U.S. House of Representatives by the narrowest of margins late Wednesday. It had been previously approved by the U.S. Senate and will soon be signed by President Bush.

The Bush administration contended that CAFTA would promote economic development in Central America, which in turn could boost the region's political stability, stem the flow of immigration and lay the groundwork for more ambitious trade deals encompassing the Western Hemisphere and the entire world.

Over an 18-year period, the deal would remove most trade barriers between the United States and El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic. The latter three countries have yet to approve the bill but are now under increased pressure from business interests to get on board, observers say.

Assuming that the agreement eventually becomes a reality, as most observers expect, Central American consumers could be clear winners. The prices of basic foods such as beans, corn and beef would fall, and now-monopolized markets in insurance and wireless telecommunications would be opened to competition. Import tariffs on auto parts and computers would fall, lowering costs.

By giving incentives to foreigners and locals to invest in factories, CAFTA may produce more industrial jobs in a region that desperately needs them. Some Central American farm sectors will benefit, especially fruit growers, as seasonal restrictions on shipping to U.S. markets are slowly lifted.

"There is a line of businesses waiting for the starting gun, and now they have it with CAFTA," said Henry Fransen, executive director of the Maquiladora Assn. of Honduras, a manufacturing trade group. "I have in my hands various letters from Brazilian, Korean and U.S. companies who have wanted to invest here, but only on the condition that CAFTA passed."

The trade bill is "no panacea" but will impose structural reforms that may over the long term lead to greater Central American prosperity, said Manuel Agosin, regional economic advisor at the Inter-American Development Bank. Those reforms include modernization, transparency of customs and investment rules and the opening of government procurement procedures.

Victor Meza, a political analyst who directs a think tank in Tegucigalpa, the Honduran capital, said CAFTA would impose higher standards on Central America's economies.

"The principal cause of poverty in Honduras and Central America is low productivity and quality," Meza said. "CAFTA is an opportunity to change the rules of the game, to emphasize skilled labor, better education…. The politicians have to realize this is not a choice but an obligation."

Another important facet of the trade pact is that it is a binding multilateral agreement. For Central American businesses that depend on exporting to the U.S., it offers greater long-term security than the current regional trade scheme called the Caribbean Basin Initiative. That deal could be suspended "whenever the United States wants," said Miguel Schyfter of the Costa Rican Textile Chamber.

"CAFTA gives more confidence to investors. The United States can't just pull the benefits," Schyfter said.

That confidence should lead to a greater flow of investment in factories and jobs, which Central America needs if it is to lift itself from the poverty that has produced a growing list of social ills. They include gangs, spiraling homicide rates and rising emigration flows.

The pact's terms particularly seem to favor investment in Central American textile and apparel manufacturing, sectors that have been clobbered by Asian competition in recent years. The most important rule change in the trade pact allows regionally produced clothing, thread and fabric to qualify to enter the U.S. duty-free without the high proportion of U.S.-produced content that was previously required, Agosin said.

But agricultural unions warned that some of Central America's farm sectors could be overwhelmed by U.S. agribusiness. Union leaders said local farmers couldn't compete against U.S. economies of scale and hyper-efficient farming methods.

Many farmworker unions pointed to the experience of some Mexican farmers after passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. Many lost their jobs in the face of low-cost U.S. grain and livestock imports and were driven to illegally emigrate to the United States to look for work.

"With CAFTA, the death agony of agriculture in El Salvador has begun," said Ramon Aristides Mendoza, leader of the Salvadoran Communal Union, consisting of 37,000 cattle owners and small farmers who work mainly in cotton, corn, beans and sugar cane. The competition with U.S. farmers, Mendoza said, "has always been unequal, and now the inequality has been formalized."

Jose Pinzon, secretary-general of the 70,000-strong Guatemalan Workers Central, called the passage a "pyrrhic victory for Bush and the Central American presidents."

"It's going to be a disaster for peasants and workers who can't count on the subsidies and cheap loans that the North Americans have," Pinzon said.

Costa Rican labor leader Albino Vargas said that over time, CAFTA would lead to the privatization of his country's public electricity, insurance and telecommunications services. That will cost more than jobs, he said.

"These public institutions have brought us 100% coverage of potable water in households throughout the country, 95% phone coverage and 97% coverage in electricity," said Vargas, general secretary of the National Assn. of Public and Private Employees. "How will these services suffer when put in the hands of foreign companies?"


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cafta; latinamerica; nationaldefense; nationalsecurity; trade

1 posted on 08/02/2005 2:18:55 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Hugo Chavez is upset because CAFTA weakens and slows his accent in taking hold of Latin America.

Hugo Chavez - Venezuela

Venezuela's Chavez says CAFTA 'perverse'*** CARACAS, Venezuela, Aug. 1 (UPI) -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez lashed out against the recently approved Central American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would harm Latin America.

Chavez called the agreement "perverse" and said it would only serve the interests of the United States, El Nacional reported Monday.

The agreement eliminates trade barriers between the United States and five Central American countries -- Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica -- along with the Dominican Republic in the Caribbean.

The U.S. House approved the agreement last week after it has already passed in the U.S. Senate. ***


2 posted on 08/02/2005 2:26:34 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

As I said in other thread that subsequently killed.

Protectionist FReepers:

Standing with the likes of Hugo Chavez, John Kerry, Fidel Castro, and Ted Kennedy.


3 posted on 08/02/2005 2:43:45 AM PDT by RWR8189 (I Will Sit on My Hands in 2008 Instead of Voting for McCain)(No Money for the NRSC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

And Christopher Dodd.


4 posted on 08/02/2005 2:45:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

BTTT


5 posted on 08/02/2005 4:23:43 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Well said.


6 posted on 08/02/2005 4:24:44 AM PDT by Syds Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"Standing with the likes of Hugo Chavez, John Kerry, Fidel Castro, and Ted Kennedy."

You might as well say FDR 'stood with' Stalin in the second world war.


7 posted on 08/02/2005 5:45:29 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Yes he did.


8 posted on 08/02/2005 6:00:54 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Just wait for the onslaught of people saying we are selling our sovereignty to Honduras (while it's OK to sell our sovereignty to China).


9 posted on 08/02/2005 6:03:14 AM PDT by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

That makes no sense in this situation.


10 posted on 08/02/2005 7:09:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
You might as well say FDR 'stood with' Stalin in the second world war.

He sure did, FDR sold Eastern Europe to him and exacerbated the Cold War as well. Then there was Hiss...and Socialism. Great prez that FDR.
11 posted on 08/02/2005 7:25:58 AM PDT by BJClinton (Are you aware that the First Amendment secures your right to refrain from incessant carping?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"The latest example of a world gone mad and a populace ignorant and indifferent to their personal self-interest illustrates the success of the ruling model of economic subversion. CAFTA has little to do about trade. Like its NAFTA predecessor, Liza Grandia makes the following assessment: “Upon close examination, one realizes that CAFTA is not a "free trade" agreement, but a corporate trade agreement that transforms foreign investment from a privilege to an inalienable right”.

"Only an ostrich society would allow the systematic and methodical economic dismantling of the middle class." Copied

Republican ostriches. As long as it is a Republican President who is destroying America, fine with them.

12 posted on 08/02/2005 7:59:00 AM PDT by swampfox98 (How American became a nation of traitors: Greed, corrupt politicians and religious leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Protectionist FReepers:

Standing with the likes of Hugo Chavez, John Kerry, Fidel Castro, and Ted Kennedy.


So if someone tells the truth, that the CAFTA violates our individual rights and national sovereignty, they are the same as Kerry, Kennedy and Castro? How do you figure that?

By your logic then, you can say that if someone is for CAFTA and "free trade" they stand with Karl Marx and Benito Mussolini.

Isn't it a duty of citizenship to protect our sovereignty for our progeny and not give it over to an international bureaucracy? Or does citizenship get in the way of "free trade", where the focus is on "consumers" who don't vote, don't care and whose only purpose is to keep purchasing "free trade" goods from slave laborers in third world countries?
13 posted on 08/02/2005 8:37:33 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swampfox98
Liza Grandia makes the following assessment: “Upon close examination, one realizes that CAFTA is not a "free trade" agreement, but a corporate trade agreement that transforms foreign investment from a privilege to an inalienable right”.

Grandia Bio
Grandia is an anthropologist who has lived and worked in Guatemala for more than six years. Her dissertation concerns the impacts of trade and globalization on the agrarian situation of the Q'eqchi' Maya people there.

Hmmmm. We should be taking advice on trade and economics from an anthropologist who wishes to keep Guatemala poor and dependent on an agrarian based economy? She writes for Common Dreams, a progressive news site. How very Conservative of you.

14 posted on 08/02/2005 9:51:18 AM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; RWR8189
By your logic then, you can say that if someone is for CAFTA and "free trade" they stand with Karl Marx and Benito Mussolini.

By your comments, hedge, it's clear that you believe, just like Marx, that free trade will incite the proletariat revolution. You also believe that we should become a self sufficient country by filling all our needs with domestically based production. Your adamant support of our government joining forces with the sugar cartel, to ensure a steady suppy with stable prices, belies your protestations to the contrary.

Remember the fascist motto:"Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State."

And you accuse your oppostition of standing with Marx and Mussolini. LOL

15 posted on 08/02/2005 10:08:16 AM PDT by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Hugo Chavez is dead meat now.

VIVA CAFTA!


16 posted on 08/02/2005 3:51:33 PM PDT by Kitten Festival (The Thug of Caracas has got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mase

But what she said was true. I don't care who she is, she is smarter than Bush.


17 posted on 08/02/2005 5:11:06 PM PDT by swampfox98 (How American became a nation of traitors: Greed, corrupt politicians and religious leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson