Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Bush Supreme Court nomination (PPH Maine letter to the Editor)
Portland Press Herald ^ | 08/02/05 | John H. Clifton

Posted on 08/02/2005 7:56:50 AM PDT by Fido969

On Bush Supreme Court nomination

I am very curious about the question that Sen. Charles Schumer has asked Supreme Court nominee John Roberts: "Is it appropriate for the Supreme Court to overturn a well-settled precedent, upon which Americans have come to rely?"

Is Sen. Schumer referring to Brown vs. Board of Education (1954), where the Supreme Court overturned Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896), a well-settled precedent upon which Americans had come to rely for 58 years, and which consigned black Americans to Jim Crow laws, second-class citizenship and legal segregation?

What puzzles me is why Sen. Schumer seems so opposed to the court's action. Does he wish to return to the days of legal segregation?

If so, does his desire reflect the position of the Democratic Party?

Or did he have some other Supreme Court decision in mind?

John H. Clifton Sanford


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nomination; roberts; schumer; soctus

1 posted on 08/02/2005 7:56:51 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Oh, boy......people are FINALLY going to start getting an EDUCATION!!!!


2 posted on 08/02/2005 8:00:22 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Our military......the world's HEROES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Oh, boy......people are FINALLY going to start getting an EDUCATION!!!!


3 posted on 08/02/2005 8:00:34 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Our military......the world's HEROES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Every time I see Schumer on TV, I'm reminded of my mother's warning, "keep making faces like that, Eric, and your face will be stuck that way forever."


4 posted on 08/02/2005 8:04:19 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fido969; SheLion

You been in the southern part of the state?


5 posted on 08/02/2005 8:07:53 AM PDT by dts32041 ( Dear Senator Durbin, I am not an Illinois Nazi. (US ARMY RET))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Schumer is a NY nut case. Any wonder. The Rat pack will fall and they will take the party with them. They just don't get it.
6 posted on 08/02/2005 8:10:11 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041


I'm all over the state - why?


7 posted on 08/02/2005 8:10:41 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The story is true" - Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
No actually that was for shelion, who lives in the county, yours was a CC:
8 posted on 08/02/2005 8:12:28 AM PDT by dts32041 ( Dear Senator Durbin, I am not an Illinois Nazi. (US ARMY RET))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
The American people had also come to rely on the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision. Of course, a Civil War overturned that one.

I think it was John Cornyn who said, "Sharks can't stop swimming, and Schumer can't stop having press conferences."

9 posted on 08/02/2005 8:14:19 AM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041; Fido969; SheLion

I'm a fifth-generation Maine native. I've never seen a better fire-starter, puppy-trainer or birdcage-liner than the Portland Press Herald. To use the "news"paper when referring to this rag is to do so very lightly... everything is so liberally slanted.

Let's kick that bum Baldacci out of office, by the way.


10 posted on 08/02/2005 8:26:00 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Is Sen. Schumer referring to Brown vs. Board of Education (1954), where the Supreme Court overturned Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896), a well-settled precedent upon which Americans had come to rely for 58 years, and which consigned black Americans to Jim Crow laws, second-class citizenship and legal segregation?

Wow, would that be an amazing answer to Chucky during the confirmation hearing, or what?!?!

11 posted on 08/02/2005 8:28:09 AM PDT by golfboy (character is doing what is right, when no one is looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Amen and his spaghetti is lousy also.
12 posted on 08/02/2005 8:34:40 AM PDT by dts32041 ( Dear Senator Durbin, I am not an Illinois Nazi. (US ARMY RET))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Reminds me of my own mothers warning "Men who look funny usually are stay away from them"


13 posted on 08/02/2005 8:42:01 AM PDT by kublia khan (absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

14 posted on 08/02/2005 8:46:56 AM PDT by Gritty ("Democrats are the party of abortion, sodomy, and athiesm" - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

EXCELLENT!!! bttt


15 posted on 08/02/2005 9:29:10 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

mark


16 posted on 08/02/2005 1:46:49 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson