Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Government should be spending less on this stuff...not more.

(This was not sent from a blackberry)

1 posted on 08/02/2005 4:34:02 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ArmyBratproud

Said Michael Cannon, director of health care studies at the Cato Institute: "Shame on us for creating perverse incentives that cause people to give up private coverage for Medicaid."


2 posted on 08/02/2005 4:34:30 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (McCain, you'll never be president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud

Big government getting bigger with a Republican president and Congress. Someone remind me again what this party is supposed to stand for.


4 posted on 08/02/2005 4:57:23 PM PDT by Altair333 (Stop illegal immigration: George Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud

The scariest part is that it costs this much even though the government pays PEANUTS for care.

Among the BIG problems with Medicaid is that it provides everything to it's users...slip and hurt your back? Call an ambulance to get to the ER rather than paying for a cab. There are NO limits to the medications that may be prescribed, as opposed to only allowing off-patent meds for routine medical problems like hypercholesterolemia or hypertension. People with no visible means of support are having children at alarming rates, at no cost to themselves.

Here in MO, there was a great amount of wailing and knashing of teeth when Blunt made even small adjustments to the state's medicaid system.


5 posted on 08/02/2005 5:03:11 PM PDT by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud

You can thank Bush and the Rino's in the senate for this mess.


7 posted on 08/02/2005 5:19:57 PM PDT by Texas_Conservative2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud
"President Bush has even proposed $1 billion in spending for the next two years "to encourage eligible families to sign up for Medicaid," "

?!?

8 posted on 08/02/2005 5:22:09 PM PDT by Klickitat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud

I wish people would stop saying COSTS when they mean SPENDING. There is a big difference.


10 posted on 08/02/2005 5:33:23 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud
The government's free health care offering swelled Medicaid's numbers as many low-income workers

Under federal rules, a family of four can earn as much as $40,000 a year in most states and still get government health insurance for children

Who knew that $40K was "low-income"?

12 posted on 08/02/2005 7:01:17 PM PDT by Lizavetta (Let not your heart be troubled.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud

"Some experts blame the growth of Medicaid on 1996's landmark welfare reform legislation, which moved millions of welfare recipients off the welfare rolls and into low paying jobs. "

SOME EXPERTS LOL! All these people got jobs and then got sick of injured so they wouldn't have to work??


18 posted on 08/03/2005 2:08:47 PM PDT by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson