Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush stands by beleaguered friend Palmeiro in steroids scandal
AFP ^ | Tue Aug 2, 2005

Posted on 08/03/2005 9:18:41 PM PDT by presidio9

US President George W. Bush has defended his longtime friend Rafael Palmeiro -- the professional ballplayer suspended this week for using performance-enhancing drugs -- saying he is convinced by Palmeiro's assertions that he never intentionally used steroids.

"Rafael Palmeiro is a friend. He testified in public and I believe him," Bush said in an interview published Tuesday in several Texas newspapers.

"He's the kind of person that's going to stand up in front of the klieg lights and say he didn't use steroids, and I believe him. Still do," the US president said.

Bush's friendship with Palmeiro dates back to the early 1990's when he was a managing partner for the Texas Rangers and Palmeiro a player with the team.

Palmeiro, 40, is one of several professional athletes who in March of this year testified under oath before a US congressional committee that he had never taken steroids.

But the Cuba-born first baseman for the Baltimore Orioles is the seventh player and first major baseball star to receive a steroid ban under a new policy agreed upon by owners and the players' union earlier this year -- one that was harshly criticized by the US Congress as being too lax.

In a statement released Monday after the suspension was announced, Palmeiro changed his claim to say he never "intentionally" has taken steroids.

Palmeiro received a ten-day suspension after failing the steroids test. Barely two weeks ago he was hailed a hero in his sport for becoming one of only four players to have 3,000 career hits and 500 homeruns.

Lawmakers in Congress expressed dismay at the news of Palmeiro's failed drug test, and suggested it may lead to serious legal repercussions for the baseball star, who could face perjury charges if a probe reveals that he lied to Congress.

Democratic Representative Elijah Cummings (news, bio, voting record), who sits on the House Government Reform Committee that Palmeiro testified before, told US television Tuesday that it seemed likely that several of his congressional colleagues would demand that Palmeiro be called to account for his positive drug test.

"I can tell you, there will be probably be some people on the committee that will press hard for it," he told CNN television.

"Here we were, we had the poster player of the league, one of our major players, to come before us, look us in the eye, shake his finger at us and say, 'I have never used steroids.' And then come to find out that he did," Cummings said.

He conceded, however, that proving Palmeiro perjured himself "would be very difficult" because of the amount of time that has passed since the March congressional hearing.

"Even if he did use steroids recently, that at the time of the hearing and before that, he didn't. So I think that's going to be hard," Cummings said.

But in the court of public opinion, Cummings said, Palmeiro already has taken a major hit.

"Every time he gets up to bat ... he has to wonder what his fellow players are thinking of him, what the fans are thinking of him, what those little children that have Palmeiro written on the backs of their baseball shirts are thinking of him. I think he's going to suffer enough," said Cummings.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: bush; palmeiro; scandals; steroids

1 posted on 08/03/2005 9:18:50 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Always liked Rafael Palmeiro, but after testing positive for anabolic steriods his recent career records are in question. Palmeiro is no better then Barry Bonds.


2 posted on 08/03/2005 9:25:32 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

makes no sense, why would the President associate himself with a cheater?


3 posted on 08/03/2005 9:33:32 PM PDT by cfo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
He conceded, however, that proving Palmeiro perjured himself "would be very difficult" because of the amount of time that has passed since the March congressional hearing.

Doing some Clintonian parsing and finagling. [Shameful!!!!]
4 posted on 08/03/2005 9:39:11 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I love Bush but there are times that he should keep his mouth shut.This is one of them.


5 posted on 08/03/2005 9:49:34 PM PDT by fish hawk (hollow points were made to hold pig lard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Talk about Palmeiro calling in a favor!


6 posted on 08/03/2005 9:51:08 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Yes, what is the worth of doing this? Stupid to comment on this.


7 posted on 08/03/2005 9:54:28 PM PDT by ottersnot (Kill a commie for your mommie....Johnnie Ramone. American Rocker and patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Actually, I kind of admire the prez for doing this. It takes conviction to stand up for a friend when everyone on the planet it pointing a finger at them. He could have easily abandoned him to the sharks but W isn't the kind of man to cast off someone when the whole world is against them.


8 posted on 08/03/2005 9:59:35 PM PDT by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: fish hawk

Totally agree. It's one thing for Bush to stand behind Rove in the Plamegate investigation, but I don't see how Bush can say he believes Palmiero after he tested positive and Canseco outed him in his book, claiming he shot Palmiero in the butt himself.


10 posted on 08/03/2005 10:30:43 PM PDT by massfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales; flying Elvis

Ditto. Palmiero was a friend before W was President. If he burns he burns, but that does not excuse a friend who abandons him.


11 posted on 08/03/2005 10:39:54 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Thanks, I would rather have a president who instinctively stands up for a friend than one who has to take a poll to decide what he believes. It was very Trumanesque of him to do that.


12 posted on 08/03/2005 10:48:50 PM PDT by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cfo
makes no sense, why would the President associate himself with a cheater?

Well, both President Bush and his father (and even Billy Graham) have decided to associate themselves with Bill Clinton a lot lately, so I guess Plastic Palmeiro is no different. They're all rich. They're all famous. They're all part of the same country club.

13 posted on 08/03/2005 11:33:03 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flying Elvis
It takes conviction to stand up for a friend when everyone on the planet it pointing a finger at them.

Or maybe it takes arrogance. Or stubbornness. Or an unwillingness to admit you have a friend who is a cheater, a liar and a steroid user.

He could have easily abandoned him to the sharks but W isn't the kind of man to cast off someone when the whole world is against them.

Has Bush invited Kenny-boy Lay to any barbecues lately?

14 posted on 08/03/2005 11:40:55 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chevy Sales
So a practicing Christian must be supportive of a "friend" who cheats, lies and uses drugs? That's not the Christianity I'm familiar with. Maybe it's the new brand of Billy Graham/Billy Clinton Christianity that's so fashionable these days?

If Bush really is a friend, he ought to call up Plastic Palmeiro and tell him to shape up. And while he's at it, the President should tell his "friend" to stop doing those creepy Viagra ads that show up during baseball coverage, causing 7-year-old kids to ask awkward questions of their dads when the dad is just trying to enjoy a ballgame with his child.

Just how many pills does Palmeiro pop on an average day anyway? He has 3,000 hits, but how many pills?

15 posted on 08/03/2005 11:49:37 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: massfreeper

It's pretty sad when someone like Jose Canseco appears to have more credibility than the President of the United States.


16 posted on 08/03/2005 11:51:36 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Rafael Palmeiro is a friend. He testified in public and I believe him."

Mr. President, can I interest you in buying a bridge in Brooklyn?

17 posted on 08/03/2005 11:54:44 PM PDT by IronMan04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Palmiero was a friend before W was President. If he burns he burns, but that does not excuse a friend who abandons him.

Bush doesn't have to abandon him, but he also doesn't have to kiss his ass by saying he believes Palmeiro's denial even in the wake of a positive drug test that held up under appeal and is causing Palmeiro to be suspended for 10 days. If Bush is really Palmeiro's friend, he's doing more harm than good right now. Palmeiro needs to come clean. Palmeiro needs to start being himself instead of trying to turn himself into someone he's not. He could be in serious trouble if he lied to Congress.

A true friend should not just nod along with Palmeiro like a bobbing-head doll. A true friend should level with him about the self-destructive path he's on and the troubling long-term health consequences of steroids.

18 posted on 08/04/2005 12:00:51 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Palmeiro is no better then Barry Bonds.

Palmeiro is no better than the best player in baseball today? High praise.

I don't see why pro athletes (or anyone else, for that matter) shouldn't be able to use any method that could improve their athletic performance. As long as they're aware of any potential health risk and don't try to stick the rest of us with any resulting medical bills, surely it's their own business with their own bodies - every bit as valid as some particular training regimen, and should be just as legal.
19 posted on 08/04/2005 12:02:53 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

You have to admire the Pres. for sticking by a friend. But I am betting that Palmeiro will not be invited to the ranch, the White House, a party dinner or function that puts him withing 100 feet of the Pres. anytime in the future.


20 posted on 08/04/2005 12:06:06 AM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flying Elvis
I would rather have a president who instinctively stands up for a friend than one who has to take a poll to decide what he believes. It was very Trumanesque of him to do that.

If Bush and Palmeiro were best buddies, I might understand Bush rushing to his defense despite a growing mountain of evidence. That would be human instinct. That would be the emotion of the moment. However, this is the first time I've ever heard of Bush being friends with Palmeiro. I imagine Bush had literally hundreds (if not thousands) of "friends" connected to Texas Rangers baseball. Is Bush prepared to blindly rush to each one's defense anytime they do something wrong?

As far as Bush's comment being "Trumanesque," Bush would've been wiser to simply say, "Mr. Palmeiro is a friend of mine, so I don't wish to comment on this until I have a chance to talk to my friend and learn more about the details of this developing story."

21 posted on 08/04/2005 12:14:18 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Surely the Prez has more pressing business to attend to?


22 posted on 08/04/2005 12:18:23 AM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
I don't see why pro athletes (or anyone else, for that matter) shouldn't be able to use any method that could improve their athletic performance.

If that's what we allowed, I believe almost all pro athletes would eventually use steroids. Some, like Ken Caminiti, would die. Some would have short-term health problems. Some would have long-term health problems. And some would hit 80 home runs in a season. You may not see a problem with that, but the problem I see is that virtually every young kid who dreams of making it to the big leagues would then have to make a decision of whether they want to risk their health with very dangerous drugs just so they can achieve their dream artificially.

Have you seen Palmeiro's reaction as he trotted into second base after his 3,000th hit? We now know that he was aware of his positive test at the time, even though it hadn't been released publicly. He didn't look happy. He didn't look thrilled. He looked uncomfortable. It was almost like he was ashamed.

What's the thrill of hitting a home run when you hit it because of something Jose Canseco injected into your rear end? It would be just as bad if Palmeiro was using an aluminum bat while other players used wooden bats.

23 posted on 08/04/2005 12:28:20 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

^


24 posted on 08/04/2005 12:30:45 AM PDT by Liberty Valance ( Howdy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

IMO, President Bush deserves credit for his high regard for Loyalty, but sheesh, he is a smart person and I still find his speaking abilities to be sub par. Not what he neccessarily says but the process of saying it...


25 posted on 08/04/2005 12:34:36 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Palmeiro is no better than the best player in baseball today? High praise.

That so-called "best player in baseball today" you speak of isn't playing much baseball these days. The waters in McCovey Cove are quite calm. But Bonds does deserve recognition for one thing - he's been an All-Star whiner this year, blaming the media for all his self-inflicted wounds. Gotta love the way he pushed his son in front of the cameras for that ESPN interview a few months ago. Real classy, Barry. Real classy.

26 posted on 08/04/2005 12:34:51 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: commonasdirt
You have to admire the Pres. for sticking by a friend. But I am betting that Palmeiro will not be invited to the ranch, the White House, a party dinner or function that puts him withing 100 feet of the Pres. anytime in the future.

Almost sounds like Bush should consider serving Palmeiro with a restraining order, LOL!

27 posted on 08/04/2005 12:36:15 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: k2blader

It just struck me that I think Bush made more specific comments about Palmeiro than he did about each of the 14 individual Marines who were killed yesterday by the I.E.D. What's wrong with that picture? Bush is Commander in Chief during wartime, not Friend in Chief and not Baseball Commissioner. When asked about Palmeiro, a "no comment" would've done just fine.


28 posted on 08/04/2005 12:40:20 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

Hearing you loud and clear, FRiend.


29 posted on 08/04/2005 12:41:52 AM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

No, Jose Canseco does not have more credibility then the President. But his allegation is yet another piece of evidence building against Palmiero. Hey, I have friends who've done something wrong and lied about it. Why does Bush have to come out and say he believes him to prove that he's still a friend?


30 posted on 08/05/2005 8:26:10 PM PDT by massfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson