Some conservative commentators are not smart enough to believe about something this complicated. But I think Mark Levin is. However, I'm still disturbed by the fact that Roberts took this gay-rights case. It doesn't tell us what he really believes about the issue, or even the courts' role in it. But it does suggest that he's very cautious, at best, about drawing lines in the sand if he thinks it would hurt his career.
Next he'll be looking to build a "legacy" as one of the "philosopher kings". I think Coulter has him pegged as another Souter.