[U.H. Conservative]

It was pro bono work that he was under no ethical obligation to take. He was a partner for pity's sake, he could pick and choose which cases he wanted to help out on.

[MikefromOhio]

he could pick and choose which cases he wanted to help out on.

And this indicates how his judicial philosophy will shape out HOW?

My God some people are paranoid here. I can understand being snakebitten, but this is really getting ridiculous. you know it is VERY disheartening to see Conservatives taking an LA TIMES story to heart and being a Conservative candidate for the Supreme Court over the head with it.

I have no more time to waste on this triviality. I can't WAIT to see the Hysteria when Roberts is confirmed.