[xzins]

With all the punctuation in this thing, it's a wonder they didn't get smacked by their old English teachers. There's mischief in the modifiers and chaos in the commas. I read it saying that homosexual ORIENTATION can't be the basis of a claim for minority status or discrimination. Which part did you object to?

Neither the State of Colorado,
through any of its branches or departments, nor any of its agencies, political subdivisions, municipalities or school districts,

shall enact,
adopt or enforce

any statute,
regulation, ordinance or policy

whereby

homosexual,
lesbian or bisexual

orientation,
conduct,practices or relationships

shall constitute
or otherwise be the basis of or entitle

any person
or class of persons

to have
or claim

any minority status,
quota preferences, protected status or claim of discrimination.

This Section of the Constitution shall be in all respects self-executing.

[xzins]

The state can't make a law where homosexual (orientation, conduct, practices, relationships) shall entitle HLB'S to claim (minority status, quota preferences, protected status or claim of discrimination.)

The state can't make a law that says Rich People get to claim discrimination based simply on their being rich.

In other words, one of the facts that proves discrimination the fact that you are Rich Man.

So, Bill Gates goes to court and says, "WalMart won't carry my new line of Dog Grooming software. It's because of discrimination."

Judge, "What facts prove that it's discrimination?"

Gates: "Well, I'm rich, and the law says that being rich means I'm a special class likely to get discriminated against."

Judge: "Why didn't you say so, my boy? In favor of Mr Gates. And WalMart, you quit discriminating."