To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's safe to assume the firm knew Roberts a) Probably argues well and b) Was probably considered conservative by other lawyers.
Hence the Firm's asking him to play the "devil's advocate".
I am sure Roberts probably had an inclination which way Thomas, Scalia and Rehnquist were going to rule on Amend 2 so in his support of the Firm he was used to sway O'Connor and Kennedy.
Money is the ultimate ideological equalizer. Although Roberts work was free, the victory brought in a huge amount leverage and respect for the firm in which to charge the paying clients.
I do not like it, but unfortunately was Robert's job, period, end of story. I hope Roberts took a long shower to wipe the filth away afterward though.
211 posted on
08/06/2005 7:29:21 AM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: rollo tomasi
He needs to publicly explain his actions, not have a bunch of others speculate on his behalf and then sweep this under the rug.
212 posted on
08/06/2005 9:22:37 AM PDT by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson