To: CFC__VRWC; ken5050; Mo1
What's unusual is that Drudge named the reporter involved..there is another agenda at work here.. Yep - the Times wanted this made public - now the question becomes why. So far the intimidation angle is the one that makes the most sense.
Drudge has some buds or budettes over at the times who slip him leads fairly often.. You'll note a lot of them occur before his radio show on Sunday evening... Thus my guess is that they wanted this out and and Drudge is the convenient mouthpiece for them.
Drudge Report has uncovered...... lol. It really has to make you laugh.
219 posted on
08/04/2005 9:42:31 AM PDT by
deport
(If you want something bad enough, there's someone who will sell it to you. Even the truth your way.)
To: deport
"Yep - the Times wanted this made public - now the question becomes why. So far the intimidation angle is the one that makes the most sense."
See my post #191. The libs are trying to spin this into a racism issue, i.e., "Roberts must have rejected a lot of brown babies in Latin American before he found these two perfect little blondes. Looks like racism to me." That's how they're spinning it, and that's why the Times raised the issue.
To: deport
Yep - the Times wanted this made public - now the question becomes why. So far the intimidation angle is the one that makes the most sense. From what I can tell of Glen Justice .. he followed the finances of candidates during the election cycle
298 posted on
08/04/2005 10:05:42 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: deport
Well I think the major [and disgusting] story here is that the NYSlimes has stooped too low, not that there will be anything damning in the "investigation."
299 posted on
08/04/2005 10:06:13 AM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(fiat voluntas Tua)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson